Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 701.102 (2026)

Sanction for past unresolved activity or outstanding matters; probation

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      701.102 Sanction for past unresolved activity or outstanding matters; probation. (1) As used in this section, “construction contractor license” means a license issued within the United States to engage in the business of construction contracting.

      (2) The Construction Contractors Board may revoke, suspend or refuse to issue a license required under this chapter to a business if:

      (a) The business owes a construction debt or has had a construction contractor license revoked or suspended;

      (b) An owner, officer or responsible managing individual of the business owes a construction debt or has had a construction contractor license revoked or suspended;

      (c) An owner, officer or responsible managing individual of the business was an owner, officer or responsible managing individual of another business at the time the other business incurred a construction debt that is owing or at the time of an event that resulted in the revocation or suspension of the other business’s construction contractor license; or

      (d) The board determines that an owner, officer or responsible managing individual of the business is not fit for licensure, based upon information submitted to the board under ORS 701.046, submitted in a registration of securities described in ORS 701.046 (2) or discovered by a board investigation under ORS 701.225.

      (3) The board may place a contractor on probation if a total of three or more complaints are filed with the board under ORS 701.139 within a 12-month period against the contractor or a former licensed construction contracting business in which the contractor held at least a 10 percent ownership interest, measured as determined by board rule. A contractor may not be placed on probation unless the board determines after investigation that it is likely that the contractor has caused harm to the complainants. The board may require a contractor that is placed on probation to develop a corrective action plan, to attend specific classes and to resolve outstanding complaints. The board may require a contractor that is placed on probation to take training and pass a test, both as described in ORS 701.122. The board shall take action to terminate the contractor’s license if the contractor is unwilling or unable to comply with the conditions of probation.

      (4) The board may use the notification of a final order received under ORS 652.333 for purposes of determining whether to:

      (a) Revoke, suspend or refuse to issue a license to a business or an owner, officer or responsible managing individual of the business that failed to pay the amounts due pursuant to the final order;

      (b) Notwithstanding the conditions specified for probation in subsection (3) of this section, place a contractor on probation as provided in subsection (3) of this section; and

      (c) Require a contractor to pay a higher amount to obtain a surety bond as required by a board condition or rule under ORS 701.068 (5) or (6). [Formerly 701.137; 1999 c.344 §8; 1999 c.402 §23a; 2001 c.924 §27; 2005 c.432 §10; 2007 c.648 §27; 2007 c.793 §8; 2009 c.226 §6; 2019 c.444 §5]

 

      701.103 [2001 c.850 §2; 2007 c.793 §9; renumbered 701.112 in 2007]

 

      701.105 [1971 c.740 §12; 1975 c.383 §5; 1979 c.312 §3; 1983 c.616 §11; 1989 c.624 §4; 1989 c.928 §12; 1991 c.181 §6; 1999 c.325 §4; 1999 c.402 §24a; 2001 c.196 §7; 2003 c.675 §75; 2003 c.766 §§1,2; 2007 c.648 §§19,20; 2007 c.836 §§23,24; renumbered 701.073 in 2007]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2006–2021 · leading case: Allied Structural v. CCB, 492 P.3d 642 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Allied Structural v. CCB, 492 P.3d 642 (Or. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 5× “The CCB’s determination of unfitness relied on ORS 701.102 and its own administrative rule.”
Ray v. Oregon Ex Rel. Constr. Contractors Bd. (In Re Ray), 355 B.R. 253 (Bankr. D. Or. 2006). · cites it 6× “The CCB denied the application citing ORS 701.102, on the grounds that Mr. Ray was an officer of a business which had unpaid final orders for claims against it at the time of the application.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 701.102(2)(c) — 1 case
Ray v. Oregon Ex Rel. Constr. Contractors Bd. (In Re Ray), 355 B.R. 253 (Bankr. D. Or. 2006). “The CCB denied the application citing ORS 701.102, on the grounds that Mr. Ray was an officer of a business which had unpaid final orders for claims against it at the time of the application.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 701.102(2)(d) — 1 case
Allied Structural v. CCB, 492 P.3d 642 (Or. Ct. App. 2021). “The CCB’s determination of unfitness relied on ORS 701.102 and its own administrative rule.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 701.102(2)(e) — 1 case
Ray v. Oregon Ex Rel. Constr. Contractors Bd. (In Re Ray), 355 B.R. 253 (Bankr. D. Or. 2006). “The CCB denied the application citing ORS 701.102, on the grounds that Mr. Ray was an officer of a business which had unpaid final orders for claims against it at the time of the application.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.