Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 701.128 (2026)

Suit for damages for misrepresentation

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      701.128 Suit for damages for misrepresentation. If any person suffered costs or damages as a result of an individual providing a false or invalid Construction Contractors Board number or otherwise misleading a person with respect to licensure with the board, that person may bring suit in a court of competent jurisdiction to recover damages. The court may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party in an action under this section. [Formerly 701.067]

 

      Note: 701.128 was enacted into law by the Legislative Assembly but was not added to or made a part of ORS chapter 701 or any series therein by legislative action. See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation.

 

      701.130 [1983 c.180 §2; 1989 c.624 §5; 1989 c.928 §14; 1991 c.703 §38; 1999 c.402 §27; 2005 c.432 §13; renumbered 701.238 in 2007]

 

COMPLAINTS

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2025–2025 · leading case: Heard Farms, Inc. v. Franzenburg LLC, No. 6:24-cv-01696 (D. Or. Aug. 28, 2025).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Heard Farms, Inc. v. Franzenburg LLC, No. 6:24-cv-01696 (D. Or. Aug. 28, 2025). · cites it 7× “It alleges: “Defendant is not registered with the Oregon Sectary of State or with the Oregon Construction Contractors Board and is liable for attorney fees under ORS 701.128.” Compl. ¶ 7. Plaintiff has since admitted that Defendant was not required to register with the Oregon…”
Heard Farms, Inc. v. Franzenburg LLC, No. 6:24-cv-01696 (D. Or. July 8, 2025). · cites it 5× “In its Third Claim, Plaintiff also asserts that “Defendant is not registered with the Oregon Secretary of State or with the Oregon Construction Contractors Board, and is liable for attorney fees under ORS 701.128.” See Notice Remov. Ex. 1, at ¶ 7.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.