Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 746.280 (2026)

Designation of particular motor vehicle repair shop by insurer prohibited; notice; limitation of costs

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      746.280 Designation of particular motor vehicle repair shop by insurer prohibited; notice; limitation of costs. (1) An insurer may not require that a particular person make the repairs to the insured’s motor vehicle as a condition for recovery by the insured under a motor vehicle liability insurance policy.

      (2) Prior to providing a recommendation that a particular person make repairs to the insured’s motor vehicle, the person adjusting the claim on behalf of the insurer shall inform the insured of the rights conferred by subsection (1) of this section by communicating in a statement substantially similar to the following:

______________________________________________________________________________

      OREGON LAW PROHIBITS US FROM REQUIRING YOU TO GET REPAIRS TO YOUR VEHICLE AT A PARTICULAR MOTOR VEHICLE REPAIR SHOP. YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO SELECT THE MOTOR VEHICLE REPAIR SHOP OF YOUR CHOICE.

______________________________________________________________________________

      (3) If an insured elects to have the motor vehicle repaired at a motor vehicle repair shop other than a shop recommended by the insurer, the insurer may not limit the cost of repairs necessary to return the motor vehicle to a preloss condition relative to safety, function and appearance other than as stated in the policy or as otherwise allowed by law.

      (4) If an insured accepts the insurer’s recommendation, the insurer shall provide, electronically or in printed form, a statement to the insured within three business days after the date of acceptance in substantially the following form:

______________________________________________________________________________

      WE HAVE RECOMMENDED A MOTOR VEHICLE REPAIR SHOP. IF YOU AGREE TO USE OUR RECOMMENDED REPAIR SHOP, YOUR VEHICLE WILL RECEIVE REPAIRS RETURNING IT TO A PRELOSS CONDITION RELATIVE TO SAFETY, FUNCTION AND APPEARANCE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO YOU OTHER THAN AS STATED IN THE INSURANCE POLICY OR AS OTHERWISE ALLOWED BY LAW.

______________________________________________________________________________ [1977 c.785 §2; 2007 c.506 §1]

 

      Note: See note under 746.275.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2023–2025 · leading case: Bellshaw v. Farmers Ins. Co., 373 Or. 307 (Or. 2025).
Bellshaw v. Farmers Ins. Co., 373 Or. 307 (Or. 2025). · cites it 75× “ORS 746.280. The law also imposes notice requirements on insurers and repair shops.”
Bellshaw v. Farmers Ins. Co., 533 P.3d 40 (Or. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 46× “HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY In 1977, the Oregon Legislature enacted ORS 746.280, which provided that an insurer could “not require that a particular person make the repairs to the insured’s motor vehicle as a condition for recovery by the insured under a motor…”
Bellshaw v. Farmers Ins. Co., 373 Or. 307 (Or. 2025). · cites it 75× “ORS 746.280. The law also imposes notice requirements on insurers and repair shops.”
Bellshaw v. Farmers Ins. Co. (Or. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 46× “HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY In 1977, the Oregon Legislature enacted ORS 746.280, which provided that an insurer could “not require that a particular person make the repairs to the insured’s motor vehicle as a condition for recovery by the insured under a motor…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 746.280(1) — 4 cases
Bellshaw v. Farmers Ins. Co., 373 Or. 307 (Or. 2025). “ORS 746.280. The law also imposes notice requirements on insurers and repair shops.”
Bellshaw v. Farmers Ins. Co., 533 P.3d 40 (Or. Ct. App. 2023). “HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY In 1977, the Oregon Legislature enacted ORS 746.280, which provided that an insurer could “not require that a particular person make the repairs to the insured’s motor vehicle as a condition for recovery by the insured under a motor…”
Bellshaw v. Farmers Ins. Co., 373 Or. 307 (Or. 2025). “ORS 746.280. The law also imposes notice requirements on insurers and repair shops.”
Bellshaw v. Farmers Ins. Co. (Or. Ct. App. 2023). “HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY In 1977, the Oregon Legislature enacted ORS 746.280, which provided that an insurer could “not require that a particular person make the repairs to the insured’s motor vehicle as a condition for recovery by the insured under a motor…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 746.280(2) — 4 cases
Bellshaw v. Farmers Ins. Co., 373 Or. 307 (Or. 2025). “ORS 746.280. The law also imposes notice requirements on insurers and repair shops.”
Bellshaw v. Farmers Ins. Co., 533 P.3d 40 (Or. Ct. App. 2023). “HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY In 1977, the Oregon Legislature enacted ORS 746.280, which provided that an insurer could “not require that a particular person make the repairs to the insured’s motor vehicle as a condition for recovery by the insured under a motor…”
Bellshaw v. Farmers Ins. Co., 373 Or. 307 (Or. 2025). “ORS 746.280. The law also imposes notice requirements on insurers and repair shops.”
Bellshaw v. Farmers Ins. Co. (Or. Ct. App. 2023). “HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY In 1977, the Oregon Legislature enacted ORS 746.280, which provided that an insurer could “not require that a particular person make the repairs to the insured’s motor vehicle as a condition for recovery by the insured under a motor…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 746.280(3) — 2 cases
Bellshaw v. Farmers Ins. Co., 373 Or. 307 (Or. 2025). “ORS 746.280. The law also imposes notice requirements on insurers and repair shops.”
Bellshaw v. Farmers Ins. Co., 373 Or. 307 (Or. 2025). “ORS 746.280. The law also imposes notice requirements on insurers and repair shops.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.