Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 756.568 (2026)

Rescission, suspension and amendment of orders

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      756.568 Rescission, suspension and amendment of orders. The Public Utility Commission may at any time, upon notice to the public utility or telecommunications utility and after opportunity to be heard as provided in ORS 756.500 to 756.610, rescind, suspend or amend any order made by the commission. Copies of the same shall be served and take effect as provided in ORS 756.558 for original orders. [Formerly 757.540; 1973 c.776 §30; 1987 c.447 §92a; 1995 c.733 §70]

 

      756.570 [Amended by 1971 c.655 §51; renumbered 756.561]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1997–2022 · leading case: Beaver Creek Coop. Tel. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 50 P.3d 1231 (Or. Ct. App. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Beaver Creek Coop. Tel. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 50 P.3d 1231 (Or. Ct. App. 2002). “The commission may attach reasonable conditions to such classification and may amend or revoke any such order as provided in ORS 756.568.” (Emphasis added.) ORS 759.025, in turn, provides: “(1) Notwithstanding ORS 759.”
Indus. Customers of Nw. Util. v. Puc, 246 P.3d 1151 (Or. Ct. App. 2010). “ORS 756.568 provides that the PUC "may at any time, upon notice to the public utility or telecommunications utility and after opportunity to be heard as provided in ORS 756.”
Indus. Customers of Nw. Utils. v. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 246 P.3d 1151 (Or. Ct. App. 2010). “ORS 756.568 provides that the PUC “may at any time, upon notice to the public utility or telecommunications utility and after opportunity to be heard as provided in ORS 756.”
Low-Income Consumers Union v. Oregon Pub. Util. Comm'n, 946 P.2d 1164 (Or. Ct. App. 1997). “PUC did not exercise its discretionary power under ORS 757.”
Nw. Pub. Commc'ns Council v. Qwest, 527 P.3d 30 (Or. Ct. App. 2022). “Such a remedy may include ordering refunds for overcharges, see Gearhart II, 356 Or at 247 (holding that the PUC had implied authority to order PGE to issue refunds to ratepay- ers for amounts associated with a retired nuclear generat- ing facility), and one way it may do so is…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.