Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 757.220 (2026)

Notice of schedule changes required; exception for alternative regulation

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      757.220 Notice of schedule changes required; exception for alternative regulation. No change shall be made in any schedule, including schedules of joint rates, except upon 30 days’ notice to the Public Utility Commission. All changes shall be plainly indicated upon existing schedules, or by filing new schedules in lieu thereof 30 days prior to the time they are to take effect. However, the commission, for good cause shown, may allow changes without requiring the 30 days’ notice by filing an order specifying the changes to be made and the time when they shall take effect. This section does not apply to rate changes authorized under an alternative form of regulation plan under ORS 757.210 (2). [Amended by 1995 c.785 §2]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1961–1997 · leading case: Pac. Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Hill, 367 P.2d 790 (Or. 1961).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Pac. Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Hill, 367 P.2d 790 (Or. 1961). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to ORS 757.220 the company on May 28, 1958, filed with the commissioner new tariffs which sought increases in intrastate telephone rates.”
Fields v. Davis, 571 P.2d 511 (Or. Ct. App. 1977). “205(1), and at every business office of the utility, ORS 757.240(1). It becomes apparent from this statutory scheme that the requirement that tariffs showing "all rates, tolls and charges” and "all rules and regulations” be filed with the Commissioner serves two distinct…”
Multnomah Cnty. v. Davis, 581 P.2d 968 (Or. Ct. App. 1978). “205 to ORS 757.220.” On appeal by the Commissioner, the county argues that the trial court was correct, and that in any event the rule should be declared invalid because it violates the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and is against public policy.”
Coalition for Safe Power v. Oregon Pub. Util. Comm'n, 939 P.2d 1167 (Or. 1997). “ORS 757.220. ORS 757.210(1) provides, in part: ‘Whenever any public utility files with [the PUC] any rate or schedule of rates stating or establishing a new rate or schedule of rates or increasing an *451 existing rate or schedule of rates, [the PUC] may, either upon written…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.