Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 757.210 (2026)

Hearing to establish new schedules; alternative regulation plan; mitigating increases in residential customer rates

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      757.210 Hearing to establish new schedules; alternative regulation plan; mitigating increases in residential customer rates. (1)(a) Whenever any public utility files with the Public Utility Commission any rate or schedule of rates stating or establishing a new rate or schedule of rates or increasing an existing rate or schedule of rates, the commission may, either upon written complaint or upon the commission’s own initiative, after reasonable notice, conduct a hearing to determine whether the rate or schedule is fair, just and reasonable. The commission shall conduct the hearing upon written complaint filed by the utility, its customer or customers, or any other proper party within 60 days of the utility’s filing; provided that no hearing need be held if the particular rate change is the result of an automatic adjustment clause. At the hearing the utility shall bear the burden of showing that the rate or schedule of rates proposed to be established or increased or changed is fair, just and reasonable. The commission may not authorize a rate or schedule of rates that is not fair, just and reasonable.

      (b) As used in this subsection, “automatic adjustment clause” means a provision of a rate schedule that provides for rate increases or decreases or both, without prior hearing, reflecting increases or decreases or both in costs incurred, taxes paid to units of government or revenues earned by a utility and that is subject to review by the commission at least once every two years.

      (2)(a) Subsection (1) of this section does not apply to rate changes under an approved alternative form of regulation plan, including a resource rate plan under ORS 757.212.

      (b) Any alternative form of regulation plan shall include provisions to ensure that the plan operates in the interests of utility customers and the public generally and results in rates that are just and reasonable and may include provisions establishing a reasonable range for rate of return on investment. In approving a plan, the commission shall, at a minimum, consider whether the plan:

      (A) Promotes increased efficiencies and cost control;

      (B) Is consistent with least-cost resources acquisition policies;

      (C) Yields rates that are consistent with those that would be obtained following application of ORS 757.269;

      (D) Is consistent with maintenance of safe, adequate and reliable service; and

      (E) Is beneficial to utility customers generally, for example, by minimizing utility rates.

      (c) As used in this subsection, “alternative form of regulation plan” means a plan adopted by the commission upon petition by a public utility, after notice and an opportunity for a hearing, that sets rates and revenues and a method for changes in rates and revenues using alternatives to cost-of-service rate regulation.

      (d) Prior to implementing a rate change under an alternative form of regulation plan, the utility shall present a report that demonstrates the calculation of any proposed rate change at a public meeting of the commission.

      (3) Except as provided in ORS 757.212, the commission, at any time, may order a utility to appear and establish that any, or all, of its rates in a plan authorized under subsection (2) of this section are in conformity with the plan and are just and reasonable. Except as provided in ORS 757.212, such rates, and the alternative form of regulation plan under which the rates are set, also shall be subject to complaint under ORS 756.500.

      (4) Periodically, but not less often than every two years after the implementation of a plan referred to in subsection (2) of this section, the commission shall submit a report to the Legislative Assembly that shows the impact of the plan on rates paid by utility customers.

      (5) The commission and staff may consult at any time with, and provide technical assistance to, utilities, their customers, and other interested parties on matters relevant to utility rates and charges. If a hearing is held with respect to a rate change, the commission’s decisions shall be based on the record made at the hearing.

      (6) The commission may adjust rates to mitigate an increase in residential customer rates if the increase is of such magnitude that, if applied at the higher rate or all at one time, the increase would affect the ability of residential customers to maintain adequate utility service. In considering whether to adjust rates under this subsection, the commission:

      (a) Must determine whether the proposed adjusted rates are fair, just and reasonable;

      (b) May not adjust rates in a manner that results in rates that are not fair, just and reasonable; and

      (c) Shall consider and may approve deferred accounting for future cost recovery from customers for those amounts that are subject to rate mitigation.

      (7) Any increase in residential rates may not take effect from November 1 to March 31. [Amended by 1971 c.655 §70a; 1981 c.715 §1; 1985 c.550 §2; 1987 c.447 §97; 1987 c.613 §1; 1989 c.5 §§3,23; 1995 c.785 §1; 2001 c.913 §3; 2005 c.845 §5; 2011 c.137 §3; 2025 c.503 §3]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 28 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1961–2023 · leading case: Pac. Nw. Bell Tel. Co. v. Davis, 608 P.2d 547 (Or. Ct. App. 1979).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Pac. Nw. Bell Tel. Co. v. Davis, 608 P.2d 547 (Or. Ct. App. 1979). · cites it 10× “" They first contend that the standard of proof provisions are invalid because they contravene or impermissably expand on the statutory standard of proof, ORS 757.210, [11] and because they are not reasonably calculated to accomplish the legislative purpose.”
Gearhart v. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 299 P.3d 533 (Or. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 6× “The rates named therein are the lawful rates until they are changed as provided in ORS 757.210 to 757.220.” See also Dreyer, 341 Or at 279 (holding that ORS 757.”
Dreyer v. Portland Gen. Elec. Co., 142 P.3d 1010 (Or. 2006). · cites it 5× “225 manifests a legislative intent that PUC-approved rates be treated as conclusively lawful for all purposes “until they are *279 changed as provided in ORS 757.210 to 757.220.” We find it significant that, although the public utility statutes provide more than one process for…”
Gearhart v. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 356 P.3d 216 (Or. 2014). · cites it 3× “The rates named therein are the lawful rates until they are changed as provided in ORS 757.210 to 757.220.” The court in Dreyer did not find that argument persuasive.”
Am. Can Co. v. Davis, 559 P.2d 898 (Or. Ct. App. 1977). · cites it 3× “The Commissioner then held hearings, as provided by ORS 757.210, to determine whether the proposed rates were just and reasonable.”
Springfield Educ. Ass'n v. Springfield Sch. Dist. No. 19, 621 P.2d 547 (Or. 1980). “Likewise, the Public Utility Commissioner is required to regulate public utilities so as to allow them rates that are "just and reasonable,” ORS 757.210, and to "protect such customers, and the public generally, from unjust and unreasonable extractions and practices and to…”
Util. Reform Proj. v. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 323 P.3d 430 (Or. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 7× “259(5) provides that, unless subject to an automatic adjustment clause, the deferral and amortization of amounts described in subsection (2) “shall be allowed in rates only to the extent authorized by the commission in a proceeding under ORS 757.210 to change rates and upon…”
Util. Reform Proj. v. Oregon Pub. Util. Comm'n, 170 P.3d 1074 (Or. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “The rates named therein are the lawful rates until they are changed as provided in ORS 757.210 to 757.220.” According to the PUC, “[t]he statute does not allow for retroactive changes pursuant to court decision or otherwise.”
Pac. Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Hill, 367 P.2d 790 (Or. 1961). · cites it 4× “Rates must be "just and reasonable," ORS 757.210. Mr. Bushnell, as a witness, expounded upon a method of rate fixing of which we will now take notice.”
Calpine Energy Solutions LLC v. Pub. Util. Comm'n of Or., 445 P.3d 308 (Or. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 4× “We first summarize the regulatory landscape, as applicable to this case, to provide context for the PUC order on review. Under ORS 756.040(1), the PUC is directed to "balance the interests of the utility investor and the consumer in establishing fair and reasonable rates"…”
Garrison v. Pac. Nw. Bell, 608 P.2d 1206 (Or. Ct. App. 1980). “565, "All rates, tariffs, classifications, regulations, practices and service fixed, approved or prescribed by the commissioner * * * shall be in force and shall be prima facie lawful and reasonable, until found otherwise in a proceeding brought for *530 that purpose under ORS…”
Fields v. Davis, 571 P.2d 511 (Or. Ct. App. 1977). · cites it 3× “Whenever a new tariff is filed, or when the rates in an existing tariff are changed, the Commissioner may, either upon written complaint from a member of the public or at his own initiative, conduct an investigation and a hearing to determine the propriety and reasonableness of…”
Show all 28 citing cases →
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 757.210(1) — 6 cases
Util. Reform Proj. v. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 323 P.3d 430 (Or. Ct. App. 2014). “259(5) provides that, unless subject to an automatic adjustment clause, the deferral and amortization of amounts described in subsection (2) “shall be allowed in rates only to the extent authorized by the commission in a proceeding under ORS 757.210 to change rates and upon…”
Util. Reform Proj. v. Oregon Pub. Util. Comm'n, 16 P.3d 516 (Or. Ct. App. 2000).
Indus. Customers of Nw. Utils. v. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 100 P.3d 1072 (Or. Ct. App. 2004).
Low-Income Consumers Union v. Oregon Pub. Util. Comm'n, 946 P.2d 1164 (Or. Ct. App. 1997).
Coalition for Safe Power v. Oregon Pub. Util. Comm'n, 939 P.2d 1167 (Or. 1997).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 757.210(1)(a) — 4 cases
Calpine Energy Solutions LLC v. Pub. Util. Comm'n of Or., 445 P.3d 308 (Or. Ct. App. 2019). “We first summarize the regulatory landscape, as applicable to this case, to provide context for the PUC order on review. Under ORS 756.040(1), the PUC is directed to "balance the interests of the utility investor and the consumer in establishing fair and reasonable rates"…”
Util. Reform Proj. v. Oregon Pub. Util. Comm'n, 372 P.3d 517 (Or. Ct. App. 2016).
Nw. Pub. Commc'ns Council v. Qwest, 527 P.3d 30 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).
Gearhart v. PUC (Or. 2014).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 757.210(l)(a) — 1 case
Gearhart v. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 356 P.3d 216 (Or. 2014). “The rates named therein are the lawful rates until they are changed as provided in ORS 757.210 to 757.220.” The court in Dreyer did not find that argument persuasive.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.