Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 774.040 (2026)

Membership on board

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      774.040 Membership on board. (1) All consumers are eligible for membership in the Citizens’ Utility Board. A consumer shall become a member of the Citizens’ Utility Board upon contribution of at least $5 but not more than $100 per year to the Citizens’ Utility Board. Each member shall be entitled to cast one vote for the election of the Citizens’ Utility Board of Governors. The board shall establish a method whereby economically disadvantaged individuals may become members of the Citizens’ Utility Board without full payment of the yearly contribution.

      (2) Each year the Citizens’ Utility Board shall cause to be prepared, by a certified public accountant authorized to do business in this state, an audit of its financial affairs. The audit is a public record subject to inspection in the manner provided in ORS 192.311 to 192.478. [1985 c.1 §9]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1996–1996 · leading case: Ascher v. Kulongoski (elections Div. 49), 909 P.2d 1228 (Or. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ascher v. Kulongoski (elections Div. 49), 909 P.2d 1228 (Or. 1996). · cites it 2× “005(1), (2), and ORS 774.040(1). [4] In response to the dissent, and for the reasons stated in Ascher v.”
Ascher v. Kulongoski, 911 P.2d 934 (Or. 1996). “005(1), (2), and ORS 774.040(1). As certified, the summary speaks to a statute that certainly would be affected.”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 774.040(1): 2 cases
Ascher v. Kulongoski (elections Div. 49), 909 P.2d 1228 (Or. 1996). “005(1), (2), and ORS 774.040(1). [4] In response to the dissent, and for the reasons stated in Ascher v.”
Ascher v. Kulongoski, 911 P.2d 934 (Or. 1996). “005(1), (2), and ORS 774.040(1). As certified, the summary speaks to a statute that certainly would be affected.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.