Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 801.395 (2026)

“Police officer.”

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      801.395 “Police officer.” “Police officer” includes a member of the Oregon State Police, a sheriff, a deputy sheriff, a city police officer, an authorized tribal police officer as defined in ORS 181A.940, a police officer commissioned by a university under ORS 352.121 or 353.125, a Port of Portland peace officer, a reserve officer as defined in ORS 133.005 or a law enforcement officer employed by a service district established under ORS 451.410 to 451.610 for the purpose of law enforcement services. [1983 c.338 §71; 2007 c.558 §1; 2009 c.299 §4; 2011 c.506 §47; 2011 c.641 §3; 2011 c.644 §§32,55; 2013 c.180 §§52,53; 2015 c.174 §23]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1991–2025 · leading case: State v. Kurtz, 249 P.3d 1271 (Or. 2011).
State v. Kurtz, 249 P.3d 1271 (Or. 2011). · cites it 18× “The Court of Appeals first considered whether Davino was a “police officer” under ORS 801.395. 2 In doing so, the Court of Appeals — identifying a common characteristic shared by the officers listed in the statute — concluded that tribal police fell within the dictionary…”
State v. Pamperien, 967 P.2d 503 (Or. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 10× “" [2] The term "police officer" is defined in ORS 801.395, which states: " `Police officer' includes a member of the Oregon State Police, a sheriff, a deputy sheriff or a city police officer.”
State v. Kurtz, 228 P.3d 583 (Or. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 16× “540, that * * * a Warm Springs Tribal Police Officer is not a police officer under the definition provided by ORS 801.395.” Defendant went on to argue that “in terms of Count 2, the Resisting Arrest count, [ORS 162.”
Daniel N. Gordon, PC v. Rosenblum, 393 P.3d 1122 (Or. 2017). · cites it 2× “For the purposes of that statute, “police officer” was defined in ORS 801.395, which at the time provided that “‘Police officer’ includes a member of the Oregon State Police, a sheriff, a deputy sheriff, [listing other officials but not tribal officers].”
State v. Holmes, 813 P.2d 28 (Or. 1991). “6 As used in the Oregon Vehicle *405 Code, 7 “police officer” includes a sheriff or a deputy sheriff, ORS 801.395, except where the context of a statute requires otherwise.”
State v. Bartol, 496 P.3d 1013 (Or. 2021). “107; “(b) Premeditated and committed intentionally against a person under 14 years of age; “(c) Premeditated, committed intentionally against a police officer as defined in ORS 801.395, and related to performance of the victim’s official duties; or “(d) Premeditated, committed…”
Reyna v. City of Portland (D. Or. 2025). · cites it 4× “That term was “defined in ORS 801.395,” which provided: “Police officer” includes a member of the Oregon State Police, a sheriff, a deputy sheriff, a city police officer, a Port of Portland peace officer or a law enforcement officer employed by a service district established…”
State v. Schaff, 57 P.3d 907 (Or. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 3× “160(l)(b) requires the person administering the test to have a valid permit; (2) OAR 257-030-0080 requires that to obtain a permit a person must be a “police officer as defined in ORS 801.395”; and (3) Zacarías did not fall within that definition of “police officer.”
State v. Oakes, 89 P.3d 1274 (Or. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “) It is undisputed that Chase was a “deputy sheriff’ within the meaning of ORS 801.395 at the time of the traffic stop.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.