Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 807.100 (2026)

Proof of medical qualification; rules

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      807.100 Proof of medical qualification; rules. (1) The Department of Transportation may not issue or renew commercial driving privileges and may cancel commercial driving privileges for a person if the department has not received and recorded, in the form approved by the department, proof of the person’s medical qualification to operate a commercial motor vehicle by the date specified by the department.

      (2) A person is entitled to administrative review under ORS 809.440 when the department does not issue or renew commercial driving privileges under this section or cancels commercial driving privileges under this section.

      (3) The department shall adopt rules to carry out the provisions of this section. [1985 c.608 §8a; 1989 c.636 §21; 2011 c.470 §2; 2013 c.237 §42; 2015 c.138 §§43,44; 2017 c.190 §6]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2007–2015 · leading case: State v. Orueta, 164 P.3d 267 (Or. 2007).
State v. Orueta, 164 P.3d 267 (Or. 2007). · cites it 16× “031 and ORS 807.100, a person must have both a commercial driver's license and a current medical certificate to operate a commercial motor vehicle.”
State v. Mannix, 326 P.3d 1236 (Or. Ct. App. 2014). “090(7) (“If a person holds a commercial driver license, a court may not defer entry of a judgment or allow an individual to enter into a diversion program.”). According to defendant, he does not have a commercial driver license because being in possession of a valid medical…”
State v. Crisafi, 350 P.3d 519 (Or. Ct. App. 2015). “215(1)(h) prohibits a person from participating in diversion if the person “hold[s] a [CDL] on the date of the commission of the offense.” A person must have a CDL, which in Oregon is issued by ODOT, to operate a commercial motor vehicle.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.