Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 813.240 (2026)

Amount and distribution of filing fee; screening interview fee

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      813.240 Amount and distribution of filing fee; screening interview fee. (1) The filing fee paid by a defendant at the time of filing a petition for a driving while under the influence of intoxicants diversion agreement as provided in ORS 813.210 is $490. A fee collected under this subsection in the circuit court shall be deposited by the clerk of the court in the Criminal Fine Account. If the fee is collected in a municipal or justice court, $290 of the fee shall be forwarded by the court to the Department of Revenue for deposit in the Criminal Fine Account, and the remainder of the fee shall be paid to the city or county treasurer.

      (2) If less than the full filing fee is collected under subsection (1) of this section in a municipal or justice court, the money received shall be allocated first to the Department of Revenue for deposit in the Criminal Fine Account.

      (3) In addition to the filing fee under subsection (1) of this section, the court shall order the defendant to pay $150 directly to the agency or organization providing the screening interview. [1983 c.338 §373; 1985 c.16 §194; 1985 c.277 §3; 1987 c.905 §30; 1989 c.576 §§8a,9a; 1989 c.635 §§2,4; 1991 c.557 §6; 1993 c.13 §7; 1999 c.1051 §297; 2003 c.737 §§71,72; 2005 c.303 §§2,3; 2005 c.702 §§85,86,87; 2009 c.595 §1143; 2011 c.595 §§167,186; 2011 c.671 §4; 2012 c.81 §§4,5; 2015 c.318 §52]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2011–2020 · leading case: State v. Reed, 249 P.3d 557 (Or. Ct. App. 2011).
State v. Reed, 249 P.3d 557 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “210 contains several provisions regarding payments associated with diversion: “(2) The defendant shall pay to the court, at the time of filing a petition for a driving under the influence of intoxicants diversion agreement, a filing fee established under ORS 813.240. The court…”
State v. Zook, 476 P.3d 508 (Or. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 4× “210(2) (payment requirement); ORS 813.240(1) (setting $490 fee)), plus $150 to the organization providing the screening interview (ORS 813.”
State v. Reed, 249 P.3d 557 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “210 contains several provisions regarding payments associated with diversion: "(2) The defendant shall pay to the court, at the time of filing a petition for a driving under the influence of intoxicants diversion agreement, a filing fee established under ORS 813.240. The court…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 813.240(1) — 1 case
State v. Zook, 476 P.3d 508 (Or. Ct. App. 2020). “210(2) (payment requirement); ORS 813.240(1) (setting $490 fee)), plus $150 to the organization providing the screening interview (ORS 813.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 813.240(2) — 2 cases
State v. Reed, 249 P.3d 557 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). “210 contains several provisions regarding payments associated with diversion: “(2) The defendant shall pay to the court, at the time of filing a petition for a driving under the influence of intoxicants diversion agreement, a filing fee established under ORS 813.240. The court…”
State v. Reed, 249 P.3d 557 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). “210 contains several provisions regarding payments associated with diversion: "(2) The defendant shall pay to the court, at the time of filing a petition for a driving under the influence of intoxicants diversion agreement, a filing fee established under ORS 813.240. The court…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 813.240(3) — 1 case
State v. Zook, 476 P.3d 508 (Or. Ct. App. 2020). “210(2) (payment requirement); ORS 813.240(1) (setting $490 fee)), plus $150 to the organization providing the screening interview (ORS 813.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.