Pa. Cons. Stat. » 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. (CRIMES AND OFFENSES) / Chapter 11
Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1105 (2026)

 Sentence of imprisonment for summary offenses.

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 1105.  Sentence of imprisonment for summary offenses.

A person who has been convicted of a summary offense may be sentenced to imprisonment for a term which shall be fixed by the court at not more than 90 days.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1978–2025 · leading case: Commonwealth v. Longo, 410 A.2d 368 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1979).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Commonwealth v. Longo, 410 A.2d 368 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1979). · cites it 2× “18 Pa.C.S. § 1105. Hence the imposition of a six months to two year sentence (which would have been within legal limits for Retail Theft, third offense, 18 Pa.”
Commonwealth v. Snyder, 688 A.2d 230 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1996). “The Borough asserts, however, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion because under the Crimes Code, 18 Pa.C.S. § 1105: A person who has been convicted of a summary offense may be sentenced to imprisonment for a term which shall be fixed by.”
Commonwealth v. Jt. Bargaining Comm. of Pennsylvania Emp. Sec. Employes Ass'n, 386 A.2d 1050 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1978). “A summary offense is punishable by a term of imprisonment not to exceed 90 days (18 Pa. C.S. §1105). However, subsection (a), in enumerating the “classes of crimes,” enumerates only murder, felonies and misdemeanors.”
United States v. Brooks, 341 F. Supp. 3d 566 (W.D. Pa. 2018). “" 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1105 . 28 Based upon the foregoing, Brooks' convictions of the third-degree misdemeanor and two summary offenses are not disqualifying convictions under 922(g)(1).”
Com. v. Collins, J., 286 A.3d 767 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2022). · cites it 2× “18 Pa.C.S. § 1105, 2709(a)(3), (c)(1). Although Collins emphasizes that he had no prior record, the sentencing guidelines do not apply to summary offenses, see 204 Pa.”
Com. v. Griggs, E., 2025 Pa. Super. 285 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2025). “See 18 Pa.C.S. § 1105. In the case sub judice, Appellant was charged with and convicted for violating subsection (a)(5) of the criminal mischief statute.”
Com. v. Brown, D. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018). · cites it 2× “Although the trial court was authorized pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 1105 to impose a sentence of imprisonment for not more than ninety days on the Section 6106.”
Diah-Kpodo, P. v. Wawa, Inc. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016). “§3929(b)(1) (providing gradings for retail theft ranging from summary offense to third-degree felony); 18 Pa.C.S. § 1105 (“A person who has been convicted of a summary offense may be sentenced to imprisonment for a term which shall be fixed by the court at not more than 90 days.”
Jhensy Saillant v. Attorney Gen. United States (3rd Cir. 2020). “§ 3929 (b)(1)(i), punishable by a maximum of ninety days in prison, see 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1105 . Saillant argues that his theft-by-deception conviction is also not a CIMT under the cat- egorical approach.”
Com. of PA ex rel. A.J. Watson, DA v. K.N. Crosby (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2023). “Section 1105 of the Crimes Code, 18 Pa.C.S. § 1105. 4 The Reproduced Record does not comport with Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 2173, Pa.”
Com. v. Mennella, A. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2021). “-5- J-S22020-21 J-S22021-21 2491-2019, Guideline Sentence Form, 6/30/20; 18 Pa.C.S. § 1105 (maximum term for summary offense is 90 days’ imprisonment).”
Com. v. Comond, M. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2025). “See 18 Pa.C.S. § 1105 (addressing the maximum sentence for a summary offense and stating that “[a] person who has been convicted of a summary offense may be sentenced to imprisonment for a term which shall be fixed by the court at not more than 90 days”).”
Show all 17 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.