Coverage note: this corpus holds the
consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check
palegis.us.
§ 5506. Loitering and prowling at night time.
Whoever at night time maliciously loiters or maliciously prowls around a dwelling
house or any other place used wholly or in part for living or dwelling purposes, belonging
to or occupied by another, is guilty of a misdemeanor of the third degree.
Cross References. Section 5506 is referred to in section 3019 of this title; section 6328 of Title 42
(Judiciary and Judicial Procedure).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
32
cases (
3 in the last 5 years), 1975–2026 · leading case:
Commonwealth v. Clark, 735 A.2d 1248 (Pa. 1999).
Commonwealth v. Clark, 735 A.2d 1248 (Pa. 1999).
· cites it 4× “NOTES [1] 18 Pa.C.S. § 5506. [2] 35 P.S. § 780-113(a)(16).”
Commonwealth v. Chapman, 414 A.2d 352 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1979).
· cites it 2× “[2] 18 Pa.C.S. § 5506. [3] Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100(a)(1) provides that "[t]rial in a court case in which a written complaint is filed against the defendant after June 30, 1973 but before July 1, 1974 shall commence no later than two hundred seventy (270) days from the date on which…”
Commonwealth v. Bortz, 909 A.2d 1221 (Pa. 2006).
“§ 3304, and one count of loitering and prowling at nighttime under 18 Pa.C.S. § 5506. A jury convicted Bortz on all counts.”
Off. of Disciplinary Couns. v. Zdrok, 645 A.2d 830 (Pa. 1994).
“4873-76 of loitering and prowling at nighttime in violation of 18 Pa.C.S. § 5506. 6. On September 8, 1988 Respondent was sentenced by Judge Nicholas to a one-year term of probation plus payment of costs in the amount of $1,000.”
Commonwealth v. Melnyczenko, 619 A.2d 719 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1992).
· cites it 2× “" 18 Pa.C.S. § 5506. Appellant argues that there is insufficient evidence to prove the elements of night time, maliciousness, and loitering or prowling.”
Commonwealth v. Dennis, 344 A.2d 713 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1975).
· cites it 2× “NOTES [1] A violation of "The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act", Act of 1972, April 14, P.”
Commonwealth v. Ahearn, 670 A.2d 133 (Pa. 1996).
“Appellant, as the party appealing, bears the burden of reproducing any relevant related matter contained in the trial court record.”
United States v. Tremayne James, 952 F.3d 429 (3d Cir. 2020).
· cites it 3× “The present appeal asks us to decide this same question for a sentence under Pennsylvania’s anti-loitering statute, 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5506 (2019). Because that law is different from the New Jersey provision in important respects, we take this opportunity to clarify our…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.