Coverage note: this corpus holds the
consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check
palegis.us.
§ 6114. Judicial review.
The action of the chief of police, sheriff, county treasurer or other officer under
this subchapter shall be subject to judicial review in the manner and within the time
provided by 2 Pa.C.S. Ch. 7 Subch. B (relating to judicial review of local agency
action). A judgment sustaining a refusal to grant a license shall not bar, after one
year, a new application; nor shall a judgment in favor of the petitioner prevent the
defendant from thereafter revoking or refusing to renew such license for any proper
cause which may thereafter occur. The court shall have full power to dispose of all
costs.
(June 13, 1995, 1st Sp.Sess., P.L.1024, No.17, eff. 120 days)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
6
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 2001–2022 · leading case:
Caba v. Weaknecht, 64 A.3d 39 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2013).
Caba v. Weaknecht, 64 A.3d 39 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2013).
“See 18 Pa.C.S. § 6114 (incorporating Section 754 of Local Agency Law).”
Tsokas v. Bd. of Licenses & Inspections Review, 777 A.2d 1197 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2001).
“Appellant also contends that the revocation notice bars his license renewal and is contrary to Section 6114 of the Uniform Firearms Act, as amended, 18 Pa.C.S. § 6114. That section provides in part that the action of a chief of police or sheriff shall be subject to judicial…”
Pennsylvania State Police v. McCaffrey, 816 A.2d 374 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2003).
“See 18 Pa.C.S. § 6114. Id. at 187. The present appeal determines only the validity of the report made and the record maintained by the PSP.”
M. Rodriguez v. J.N. Hanna (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2022).
“See 18 Pa. C.S. § 6114; 2 Pa. C.S. § 752. Where a full and complete record 5 of the proceedings before the sheriff is not made, the trial court may hear the appeal de novo or remand to the sheriff for the purpose of making a full and complete record.”
Pennsylvania State Police v. Pecora, 862 A.2d 734 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2004).
“Pécora further suggests that his May 1998 order from the trial court on review of his license denial, which was pursuant to Section 6114, as amended, 18 Pa.C.S. § 6114, did not deal with Section 6105 or attempt to affect any disability imposed by the federal statute.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.