Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

20 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2701 (2026)

  Contracts concerning succession.

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

 

 

CHAPTER 27

CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENTS RELATING

TO SUCCESSION

 

Sec.

2701.  Contracts concerning succession.

 

Enactment.  Chapter 27 was added December 16, 1992, P.L.1163, No.152, effective immediately.

 

§ 2701.  Contracts concerning succession.

(a)  Establishment of contract.--A contract to die intestate or to make or not to revoke a will or testamentary provision or an obligation dischargeable only at or after death can be established in support of a claim against the estate of a decedent only by:

(1)  provisions of a will of the decedent stating material provisions of the contract;

(2)  an express reference in a will of the decedent to a contract and extrinsic evidence proving the terms of the contract; or

(3)  a writing signed by the decedent evidencing the contract.

(b)  Joint will or mutual wills.--The execution of a joint will or mutual wills does not create a presumption of a contract not to revoke the will or wills.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1997–2018 · leading case: Stanley, S. v. Hendershot, N., No. 814 MDA 2017 (Pa. Super. Ct. May 18, 2018).
Stanley, S. v. Hendershot, N., No. 814 MDA 2017 (Pa. Super. Ct. May 18, 2018). · cites it 12× “Executor argued that 20 Pa.C.S. § 2701 of Pennsylvania’s Probate, Estates, and Fiduciaries Code6 abolished any common law cause of action for breach of oral contract.”
In re Est. of Balter, 703 A.2d 1038 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1997). “See 20 Pa. Cons. StatAnn. § 2701(a)(1) & (2), supra.”
20 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2701(a): 1 case
Stanley, S. v. Hendershot, N., No. 814 MDA 2017 (Pa. Super. Ct. May 18, 2018). “Executor argued that 20 Pa.C.S. § 2701 of Pennsylvania’s Probate, Estates, and Fiduciaries Code6 abolished any common law cause of action for breach of oral contract.”
20 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2701(a)(1): 2 cases
In re Est. of Balter, 703 A.2d 1038 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1997). “See 20 Pa. Cons. StatAnn. § 2701(a)(1) & (2), supra.”
Stanley, S. v. Hendershot, N., No. 814 MDA 2017 (Pa. Super. Ct. May 18, 2018). “Executor argued that 20 Pa.C.S. § 2701 of Pennsylvania’s Probate, Estates, and Fiduciaries Code6 abolished any common law cause of action for breach of oral contract.”
20 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2701(a)(2): 1 case
Stanley, S. v. Hendershot, N., No. 814 MDA 2017 (Pa. Super. Ct. May 18, 2018). “Executor argued that 20 Pa.C.S. § 2701 of Pennsylvania’s Probate, Estates, and Fiduciaries Code6 abolished any common law cause of action for breach of oral contract.”
20 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2701(a)(3): 1 case
Stanley, S. v. Hendershot, N., No. 814 MDA 2017 (Pa. Super. Ct. May 18, 2018). “Executor argued that 20 Pa.C.S. § 2701 of Pennsylvania’s Probate, Estates, and Fiduciaries Code6 abolished any common law cause of action for breach of oral contract.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.