Coverage note: this corpus holds the
consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check
palegis.us.
CHAPTER 23
JURISDICTION AND PARTIES
Subchapter
A. Jurisdiction
B. Parties
Enactment. Chapter 23 was added October 15, 1980, P.L.934, No.163, effective January 1, 1981.
SUBCHAPTER A
JURISDICTION
Sec.
2301. Court.
2302. Venue.
§ 2301. Court.
The court of common pleas of each county shall exercise through the appropriate division
original jurisdiction over voluntary relinquishment, involuntary termination and adoption
proceedings.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
5
cases (
3 in the last 5 years), 1987–2026 · leading case:
Russell v. Bridgens, 647 N.W.2d 56 (Neb. 2002).
Russell v. Bridgens, 647 N.W.2d 56 (Neb. 2002).
· cites it 2× “" 23 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. § 2301 (West 2001).”
Conklin v. Commonwealth, 522 A.2d 1207 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1987).
“That division of the common pleas court has, of course, jurisdiction over such matters, see 23 Pa. C. S. §2301, and a parent resisting an involuntary termination of parental rights may always contest an involuntary termination or the adoption of her children in that court.”
In Re: Adoption of: D.G.J., Appeal of: H.L.H., 277 A.3d 12034, 2022 PA Super 111 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2022).
· cites it 2× “While the court of common pleas of each county exercises original jurisdiction over adoption proceedings, see 23 Pa.C.S. § 2301, “[t]he courts have no authority to decree an adoption in the absence of statutorily required consents[.”
In the Int. of: M.K.L., Appeal of: Phila. DHS, 354 A.3d 42, 2026 PA Super 33 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2026).
“§§ 711, 713; see also 23 Pa.C.S. § 2301 (court of common pleas has original jurisdiction over involuntary termination matters to be exercised through appropriate division); 42 Pa.”
In Re: Adoption of: A.P.C.-D., a Minor, No. 1432 MDA 2025 (Pa. Super. Ct. Apr. 13, 2026).
“” 23 Pa.C.S. § 2301. Furthermore, involuntary termination proceedings may be brought, inter alia, “in the court of the county” in which is located “an office of an agency” that has custody of the subject child.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.