Coverage note: this corpus holds the
consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check
palegis.us.
§ 7603. Effect of registration for enforcement.
(a) Procedure.--A support order or income-withholding order issued in another state or a foreign support
order is registered when the order is filed in the registering tribunal of this State.
(b) Enforcement.--A registered support order issued in another state or a foreign county is enforceable
in the same manner and is subject to the same procedures as an order issued by a tribunal
of this State.
(c) Faith and credit.--Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, a tribunal of this State shall recognize
and enforce but may not modify a registered support order if the issuing tribunal
had jurisdiction.
(Dec. 28, 2015, P.L.559, No.94, eff. imd.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
3
cases, 1998–2016 · leading case:
Clark v. Clark, 714 A.2d 427 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1998).
Clark v. Clark, 714 A.2d 427 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1998).
“23 Pa.C.S. § 7603. Further, the UIFSA requires that the nonre-gistering party receive notice of registration, and provides a procedure through which the validity or enforcement of the registered order may be contested.”
Thompson v. Santiago, 57 Pa. D. & C.4th 170 (2001).
“(citing 23 Pa.C.S. §7603). On the other hand, a paternity finding, as well as a decision regarding the amount of past due arrearages, are final orders entitled to constitutionally-based full faith and credit in Pennsylvania.”
J.A.R. v. R.L.M. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016).
“” 23 Pa.C.S. § 7603(b). The non- registering party may contest the validity or enforcement of a registered order by proving, inter alia, “[t]he issuing tribunal lacked personal jurisdiction over the contesting party.”
— 23 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7603(b) — 1 case
J.A.R. v. R.L.M. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016).
“” 23 Pa.C.S. § 7603(b). The non- registering party may contest the validity or enforcement of a registered order by proving, inter alia, “[t]he issuing tribunal lacked personal jurisdiction over the contesting party.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.