Pa. Cons. Stat. » 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. (JUDICIARY) / Chapter 97
Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9729 (2026)

  Intermediate punishment (Repealed).

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 9729.  Intermediate punishment (Repealed).

 

2000 Repeal.  Section 9729 was repealed June 22, 2000, P.L.345, No.41, effective in 60 days.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1991–2005 · leading case: Commonwealth v. Santiago, 855 A.2d 682 (Pa. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Commonwealth v. Santiago, 855 A.2d 682 (Pa. 2004). · cites it 2× “" 42 Pa.C.S. § 9729(a). Thus, such a conviction may properly be used to support an aggravating circumstance.”
Commonwealth v. Infante, 888 A.2d 783 (Pa. 2005). · cites it 2× “In its opinion, the trial court stated that its imposition of a term of Intermediate Punishment, pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 9729, was in lieu of a mandatory minimum sentence of three years of imprisonment that would otherwise have been required for each PWID conviction under 18 Pa.”
Commonwealth v. Faulkner, 595 A.2d 28 (Pa. 1991). “” 42 Pa.C.S. § 9729(a). In a death penalty case, evidence that does not rise to the level of a recognized defense or mitigation of first degree murder is only admissible in the penalty phase.”
Commonwealth v. Wegley, 829 A.2d 1148 (Pa. 2003). “§ 1104(b)(1) (stating that only “eligible offenders” may be sentenced to a county intermediate punishment program); 42 Pa.C.S. § 9729(b) (indicating that an “eligible offender” is a non-violent offender who would otherwise be sentenced to partial confinement pursuant to Section…”
Commonwealth v. Arest, 734 A.2d 910 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1999). “e Commonwealth raises the following issue on appeal: DID THE [TRIAL] COURT ERR IN AFFIRMING THE MUNICIPAL COURT ORDER, WHICH IMPOSED AN ILLEGAL SENTENCE OF INTERMEDIATE PUNISHMENT (HOUSE ARREST) FOR APPEL-LEE’S SECOND CONVICTION OF DRIVING WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL,…”
Commonwealth v. Wrobleski, 29 Pa. D. & C.4th 33 (1995). “Under the eligibility standards set forth in the Act, 42 Pa.C.S. §9729(c)(2), one is not eligible for IPP if convicted of burglary under section 3502, if graded as a felony of the first degree.”
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9729(a) — 3 cases
Commonwealth v. Santiago, 855 A.2d 682 (Pa. 2004). “" 42 Pa.C.S. § 9729(a). Thus, such a conviction may properly be used to support an aggravating circumstance.”
Commonwealth v. Faulkner, 595 A.2d 28 (Pa. 1991). “” 42 Pa.C.S. § 9729(a). In a death penalty case, evidence that does not rise to the level of a recognized defense or mitigation of first degree murder is only admissible in the penalty phase.”
Commonwealth v. Arest, 734 A.2d 910 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1999). “e Commonwealth raises the following issue on appeal: DID THE [TRIAL] COURT ERR IN AFFIRMING THE MUNICIPAL COURT ORDER, WHICH IMPOSED AN ILLEGAL SENTENCE OF INTERMEDIATE PUNISHMENT (HOUSE ARREST) FOR APPEL-LEE’S SECOND CONVICTION OF DRIVING WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL,…”
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9729(b) — 1 case
Commonwealth v. Wegley, 829 A.2d 1148 (Pa. 2003). “§ 1104(b)(1) (stating that only “eligible offenders” may be sentenced to a county intermediate punishment program); 42 Pa.C.S. § 9729(b) (indicating that an “eligible offender” is a non-violent offender who would otherwise be sentenced to partial confinement pursuant to Section…”
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9729(c)(2) — 1 case
Commonwealth v. Wrobleski, 29 Pa. D. & C.4th 33 (1995). “Under the eligibility standards set forth in the Act, 42 Pa.C.S. §9729(c)(2), one is not eligible for IPP if convicted of burglary under section 3502, if graded as a felony of the first degree.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.