Pa. Cons. Stat. » 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. (JUDICIARY) / Chapter 97
Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9799.3 (2026)

 Board (Expired).

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 9799.3.  Board (Expired).

 

2012 Expiration.  Section 9799.3 expired December 20, 2012. See Act 111 of 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1999–2016 · leading case: Commonwealth v. Williams, 733 A.2d 593 (Pa. 1999).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Commonwealth v. Williams, 733 A.2d 593 (Pa. 1999). · cites it 6× “After receiving the Assessment Board's report, the court holds a full and complete hearing in order to determine whether the offender is a sexually violent predator.”
Commonwealth v. Conklin, 897 A.2d 1168 (Pa. 2006). “' See 42 Pa.C.S. § 9799.3. Because it was undisputed that Humphreys was a qualified criminal justice expert, the panel majority concluded that Humphreys could perform and testify to SVP assessments, including assessments regarding mental abnormality or personality disorder.”
Com. v. Baer, W. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016). “See 42 Pa.C.S. § 9799.3(a). -7- J-S61025-16 concluded that Baer is “likely to re-offend given the opportunity,” that he initiated the relationship with the victim, coerced her into a sexual relationship where she created child pornography at his direction, begged the victim not…”
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9799.3(a) — 2 cases
Commonwealth v. Williams, 733 A.2d 593 (Pa. 1999). “After receiving the Assessment Board's report, the court holds a full and complete hearing in order to determine whether the offender is a sexually violent predator.”
Com. v. Baer, W. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016). “See 42 Pa.C.S. § 9799.3(a). -7- J-S61025-16 concluded that Baer is “likely to re-offend given the opportunity,” that he initiated the relationship with the victim, coerced her into a sexual relationship where she created child pornography at his direction, begged the victim not…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.