§ 3303. Medical Services Program.
(a) Establishment.--The Medical Services Program is established in the department which shall include,
but not be limited to, the provisions of this chapter. The program shall be a copay
program requiring inmates to pay a fee to cover a portion of the actual costs of the
medical services provided.
(b) Fees.--
(1) The department shall develop by regulation a program for inmates which includes fees
for certain medical services. The regulations shall provide for consistent medical
services guidelines by specifying the medical services which are subject to fees,
the fee amounts, payment procedures, medical services which are not subject to fees
and fees applicable to medical emergencies, chronic care and preexisting conditions.
(2) In addition to other medical services provided to the inmate, an inmate may be required
to pay a fee for medical services provided because of injuries the inmate inflicted
upon himself or another inmate.
(c) Explanation of program.--Each inmate shall be advised of the medical services fees and payment procedures at
the time of intake. An explanation of the program regulations shall be included in
the inmate handbook.
(d) Written notice of changes.--Each inmate shall receive written notice of any changes in medical services fees and
payment procedures and an initial written notice of the program's implementation.
(e) Payment for medical services.--
(1) No inmate shall be denied access to medical services because of an inability to pay
the required fees.
(2) The department shall devise and implement a program whereby inmates of State correctional
institutions who have medical insurance shall pay for their own medical needs through
that insurance. This program shall be contained in regulations promulgated by the
department.
(f) Fee debits.--An inmate shall acknowledge in writing any debit made to his inmate account for a
medical services fee.
(g) Deposits.--Medical services fees collected under this chapter shall be deposited in the General
Fund.
Cross References. Section 3303 is referred to in sections 3302, 3304 of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Benchoff v. Pa. Dept. of Corr., 185 A.3d 979 (Pa. 2018).
· cites it 2× “See 61 Pa.C.S. § 3303(a). DOC charges a copay for, inter alia, nonemergency medical services provided at the inmate’s request and initial medication prescriptions.”
Jones v. Dep't of Corr., 39 A.3d 599 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2012).
· cites it 4× “The Correctional Institution Medical Services Act directs DOC to develop regulations for the Program that include fees for certain medical services and "consistent medical services guidelines by specifying the medical services which are subject to fees, the fee amounts, payment…”
R. DuBoise v. B. Rumcik, 256 A.3d 508 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2021).
· cites it 2× “Further, in accordance with Section 3303 of the Correctional Institution Medical Services Act (CIMSA), 61 Pa.C.S. § 3303, DOC established a Prison Medical Services Program that provides inmate access to medical services and health care professionals, subject to fees in certain 7…”
Political Prisoner DL 4686 (a/k/a A.D. Brown) v. PA. DOC, No. 374 M.D. 2019 (Pa. Commw. Ct. Mar. 9, 2023).
· cites it 2× “Therein, he argues that DOC’s copay assessments violate Subsections 3303(a) through (c) of the Correctional Institution Medical Services Act, 61 Pa. C.S. § 3303(a)-(c);1 37 Pa. 1 These subsections read as follows: (a) Establishment.”
B. Burks v. DOC, No. 684 C.D. 2015 (Pa. Commw. Ct. Mar. 21, 2016).
“” 61 Pa.C.S. § 3303(b)(2). Moreover, “no statute of limitation 6 For these reasons, we will not address the issues Burks raised in his brief regarding his Misconduct hearing.”
E. Maple v. PA DOC, No. 275 M.D. 2020 (Pa. Commw. Ct. Aug. 11, 2021).
“” 61 Pa. C.S. §3303(a). In the instant case, on August 17, 2019, Maple began refusing meals, and in doing so, triggered the facility’s hunger strike protocol.”
61 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3303(a): 6 cases
Benchoff v. Pa. Dept. of Corr., 185 A.3d 979 (Pa. 2018).
“See 61 Pa.C.S. § 3303(a). DOC charges a copay for, inter alia, nonemergency medical services provided at the inmate’s request and initial medication prescriptions.”
Political Prisoner DL 4686 (a/k/a A.D. Brown) v. PA. DOC, No. 374 M.D. 2019 (Pa. Commw. Ct. Mar. 9, 2023).
“Therein, he argues that DOC’s copay assessments violate Subsections 3303(a) through (c) of the Correctional Institution Medical Services Act, 61 Pa. C.S. § 3303(a)-(c);1 37 Pa. 1 These subsections read as follows: (a) Establishment.”
E. Maple v. PA DOC, No. 275 M.D. 2020 (Pa. Commw. Ct. Aug. 11, 2021).
“” 61 Pa. C.S. §3303(a). In the instant case, on August 17, 2019, Maple began refusing meals, and in doing so, triggered the facility’s hunger strike protocol.”
61 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3303(b)(1): 1 case
Jones v. Dep't of Corr., 39 A.3d 599 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2012).
“The Correctional Institution Medical Services Act directs DOC to develop regulations for the Program that include fees for certain medical services and "consistent medical services guidelines by specifying the medical services which are subject to fees, the fee amounts, payment…”
61 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3303(b)(2): 2 cases
Jones v. Dep't of Corr., 39 A.3d 599 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2012).
“The Correctional Institution Medical Services Act directs DOC to develop regulations for the Program that include fees for certain medical services and "consistent medical services guidelines by specifying the medical services which are subject to fees, the fee amounts, payment…”
B. Burks v. DOC, No. 684 C.D. 2015 (Pa. Commw. Ct. Mar. 21, 2016).
“” 61 Pa.C.S. § 3303(b)(2). Moreover, “no statute of limitation 6 For these reasons, we will not address the issues Burks raised in his brief regarding his Misconduct hearing.”
61 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3303(g): 1 case
R. DuBoise v. B. Rumcik, 256 A.3d 508 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2021).
“Further, in accordance with Section 3303 of the Correctional Institution Medical Services Act (CIMSA), 61 Pa.C.S. § 3303, DOC established a Prison Medical Services Program that provides inmate access to medical services and health care professionals, subject to fees in certain 7…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.