Pa. Cons. Stat. » 66 Pa. Cons. Stat. (PUBLIC UTILITIES) / Chapter 30
Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

66 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3004 (2026)

 Commission review and approval of petition and plan (Repealed).

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 3004.  Commission review and approval of petition and plan (Repealed).

 

2004 Repeal.  Section 3004 was repealed November 30, 2004, P.L.1398, No.183, effective immediately.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1995–2000 · leading case: Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util., 706 A.2d 1197 (Pa. 1997).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util., 706 A.2d 1197 (Pa. 1997). · cites it 8× “Pursuant to its options in 66 Pa.C.S. § 3004(b), Bell advised the PUC within thirty days that it would accept the modifications.”
Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 669 A.2d 1029 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1995). · cites it 14× “” 66 Pa. C.S. § 3004. Generally, the requirement that rates be just and reasonable mandates that the proposed rates do not unreasonably benefit a utility’s investors at the expense of the utility’s ratepayers.”
Bell Atl.-Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 763 A.2d 440 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2000). · cites it 4× “In short, Bell claims that Chapter 30, at 66 Pa.C.S. § 3004(a),(b) expressly provides that Bell’s rates are to be governed by its approved Plan.”
— 66 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3004(a) — 2 cases
Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 669 A.2d 1029 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1995). “” 66 Pa. C.S. § 3004. Generally, the requirement that rates be just and reasonable mandates that the proposed rates do not unreasonably benefit a utility’s investors at the expense of the utility’s ratepayers.”
Bell Atl.-Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 763 A.2d 440 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2000). “In short, Bell claims that Chapter 30, at 66 Pa.C.S. § 3004(a),(b) expressly provides that Bell’s rates are to be governed by its approved Plan.”
— 66 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3004(b) — 3 cases
Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util., 706 A.2d 1197 (Pa. 1997). “Pursuant to its options in 66 Pa.C.S. § 3004(b), Bell advised the PUC within thirty days that it would accept the modifications.”
Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 669 A.2d 1029 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1995). “” 66 Pa. C.S. § 3004. Generally, the requirement that rates be just and reasonable mandates that the proposed rates do not unreasonably benefit a utility’s investors at the expense of the utility’s ratepayers.”
Bell Atl.-Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 763 A.2d 440 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2000). “In short, Bell claims that Chapter 30, at 66 Pa.C.S. § 3004(a),(b) expressly provides that Bell’s rates are to be governed by its approved Plan.”
— 66 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3004(c) — 1 case
Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 669 A.2d 1029 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1995). “” 66 Pa. C.S. § 3004. Generally, the requirement that rates be just and reasonable mandates that the proposed rates do not unreasonably benefit a utility’s investors at the expense of the utility’s ratepayers.”
— 66 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3004(d) — 1 case
Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 669 A.2d 1029 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1995). “” 66 Pa. C.S. § 3004. Generally, the requirement that rates be just and reasonable mandates that the proposed rates do not unreasonably benefit a utility’s investors at the expense of the utility’s ratepayers.”
— 66 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3004(d)(1) — 1 case
Bell Atl.-Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 763 A.2d 440 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2000). “In short, Bell claims that Chapter 30, at 66 Pa.C.S. § 3004(a),(b) expressly provides that Bell’s rates are to be governed by its approved Plan.”
— 66 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3004(d)(2) — 2 cases
Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util., 706 A.2d 1197 (Pa. 1997). “Pursuant to its options in 66 Pa.C.S. § 3004(b), Bell advised the PUC within thirty days that it would accept the modifications.”
Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 669 A.2d 1029 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1995). “” 66 Pa. C.S. § 3004. Generally, the requirement that rates be just and reasonable mandates that the proposed rates do not unreasonably benefit a utility’s investors at the expense of the utility’s ratepayers.”
— 66 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3004(d)(3) — 1 case
Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 669 A.2d 1029 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1995). “” 66 Pa. C.S. § 3004. Generally, the requirement that rates be just and reasonable mandates that the proposed rates do not unreasonably benefit a utility’s investors at the expense of the utility’s ratepayers.”
— 66 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3004(d)(4) — 2 cases
Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util., 706 A.2d 1197 (Pa. 1997). “Pursuant to its options in 66 Pa.C.S. § 3004(b), Bell advised the PUC within thirty days that it would accept the modifications.”
Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 669 A.2d 1029 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1995). “” 66 Pa. C.S. § 3004. Generally, the requirement that rates be just and reasonable mandates that the proposed rates do not unreasonably benefit a utility’s investors at the expense of the utility’s ratepayers.”
— 66 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3004(e) — 1 case
Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 669 A.2d 1029 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1995). “” 66 Pa. C.S. § 3004. Generally, the requirement that rates be just and reasonable mandates that the proposed rates do not unreasonably benefit a utility’s investors at the expense of the utility’s ratepayers.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.