Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

73 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 101 (2026)

 Short title (Reserved).

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

 

 

TITLE 73

TOWNSHIPS

 

Part

I.  Preliminary Provisions

II.  First Class Township Code

III.  (Reserved)

 

Enactment.  Unless otherwise noted, the provisions of Title 73 were added February 11, 2026 (P.L.19, No.7), effective in 60 days.

 

 

PART I

PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS

 

Chapter

1.  General Provisions

 

Enactment.  Part I was added February 11, 2026 (P.L.19, No.7), effective in 60 days.

Special Provisions in Appendix.  See section 3 of Act 7 of 2026 in the appendix to this title for special provisions relating to continuation of prior law.

 

 

CHAPTER 1

GENERAL PROVISIONS

 

Sec.

101.  Short title (Reserved).

102.  Definitions.

103.  Savings clauses where class of township changed.

104.  (Reserved).

105.  Classification of townships.

106.  Creation of townships of the first class from townships of the second class.

107.  Reestablishment of townships of the second class.

108.  Consolidation or merger.

109.  Officers for new townships.

110.  Certificate of creation of township.

111.  Change of name of township.

 

Enactment.  Chapter 1 was added February 11, 2026 (P.L.19, No.7), effective in 60 days.

§ 101.  Short title (Reserved).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1988–1988 · leading case: Edkin v. Travelers Companies, 3 Pa. D. & C.4th 557 (1988).
Edkin v. Travelers Companies, 3 Pa. D. & C.4th 557 (1988). “Count II, which is at issue here, claims further damages under the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act, 73 Pa.C.S. §101 et seq. Specifically, plaintiff contends that defendant’s actions constitute unfair claims settlement or compromise practices by failing to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.