Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1751 (2026)

 Organization.

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

 

 

SUBCHAPTER E

ASSIGNED CLAIMS PLAN

 

Sec.

1751.  Organization.

1752.  Eligible claimants.

1753.  Benefits available.

1754.  Additional coverage.

1755.  Coordination of benefits.

1756.  Subrogation.

1757.  Statute of limitations.

 

Cross References.  Subchapter E is referred to in section 1787 of this title.

§ 1751.  Organization.

Insurers providing financial responsibility as required by law shall organize and maintain, subject to the approval and regulation of the Insurance Department, an Assigned Claims Plan and adopt rules for the operation and for the assessment of costs on a fair and equitable basis.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1986–2011 · leading case: Jackson v. Travelers Ins., 606 A.2d 1384 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1992).
Jackson v. Travelers Ins., 606 A.2d 1384 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1992). · cites it 2× “75 Pa.C.S. § 1751. A person is eligible to recover under the Plan if he or she meets the eligibility requirements set forth in section 1752 of the MVFRL.”
Zeigler v. Constitution State Serv. Co., 634 A.2d 261 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1993). “The court said: This court finds that plaintiffs must be denied the benefits coverage they are seeking under subchapter “E” of MVFRL, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1751 et seq. In section 1711 of the MVFRL the Pennsylvania Legislature set out the requirement that first-party benefits would only…”
Jones-Molina v. Se. Pennsylvania Transp. Auth., 29 A.3d 73 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2011). · cites it 2× “75 Pa.C.S. § 1751. In general, the Plan exists to provide benefits to automobile accident victims who have no other source of compensation.”
Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania Fin. Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan, 731 A.2d 228 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1999). “However, in 1996, the Plan began denying claims for reimbursement of medical assistance benefits submitted by DPW, as it concluded that it was not liable for such reimbursement.”
Johnson v. Pennsylvania Fin. Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan, 12 Pa. D. & C.4th 471 (1991). · cites it 2× “Plaintiffs claim that the defendants are required to provide both “basic loss benefits” and “uninsured motorist benefits” pursuant to the provisions of the Pennsylvania Financial *473 Responsibility Law, 75 Pa.C.S. §1751 et seq. and the Pennsylvania Uninsured Motorist Act.”
Blair v. Travelers Ins., 8 Pa. D. & C.4th 157 (1990). · cites it 2× “*159 The Assigned Claims Plan The Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan is an insurers’ organization which administers limited statutory benefits to certain eligible claimants pursuant to Subchapter E of the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, 75…”
Edkin v. Travelers Companies, 3 Pa. D. & C.4th 557 (1988). “Plaintiff therefore applied for insurance benefits under the Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan, 75 Pa.C.S. §1751 et seq., on February 4, 1987.”
Gali v. Travelers Ins., 43 Pa. D. & C.3d 522 (1986). “Additional defendants raised a preliminary objection in the nature of a demurrer to the third-party complaint.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.