Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3103 (2026)
Persons riding animals or driving animal-drawn vehicles.
✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
PA-LEGpalegis.us
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 3103. Persons riding animals or driving animal-drawn vehicles.
(a) General rule.--Every person riding an animal or driving any animal-drawn vehicle upon a roadway shall be granted all of the rights and shall be subject to all of the duties applicable to the driver of a vehicle by this part, except those provisions of this part which by their very nature can have no application or where specifically provided otherwise.
(b) Limited access highways.--No person shall ride an animal or drive any animal-drawn vehicle upon a limited access highway.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2004–2015 · leading case: Commonwealth v. Noel, 857 A.2d 1283 (Pa. 2004).
Commonwealth v. Noel, 857 A.2d 1283 (Pa. 2004). “75 Pa.C.S. § 3103(a) (emphasis added). [1] For the reasons set forth below, we agree with the trial court below that Section 3103(a) is unconstitutionally vague and therefore affirm.”
Commonwealth v. Thompson, 111 A.3d 802 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2015). “The terms of the Ordinance are specific and the Ordinance provides a reasonable standard by which a person can gauge his or her conduct.”
Commonwealth v. Temple, 70 Pa. D. & C.4th 32 (Pa. Ct. Com. Pl. 2004). “§5503(a)(4), because the Commonwealth is unable to show defendant was operating his vehicle on a “highway” or “trafficway” as required by 75 Pa.C.S. §3103(b). A hearing on this matter was held October 25,2004.”
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3103(a): 1 case
Commonwealth v. Noel, 857 A.2d 1283 (Pa. 2004). “75 Pa.C.S. § 3103(a) (emphasis added). [1] For the reasons set forth below, we agree with the trial court below that Section 3103(a) is unconstitutionally vague and therefore affirm.”
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3103(b): 1 case
Commonwealth v. Temple, 70 Pa. D. & C.4th 32 (Pa. Ct. Com. Pl. 2004). “§5503(a)(4), because the Commonwealth is unable to show defendant was operating his vehicle on a “highway” or “trafficway” as required by 75 Pa.C.S. §3103(b). A hearing on this matter was held October 25,2004.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.