Rhode Island General Laws
R.I. Gen. Laws § 13-8-8 (2026)
Sentences subject to control of board
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
RI-LEGwebserver.rilegislature.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Whenever a person convicted of any offense shall be sentenced to be imprisoned in the adult correctional institutions for a period of more than six (6) months, his or her sentence shall be subject to the control of the parole board as provided for in this chapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1983–2002 · leading case: Lerner v. Gill, 463 A.2d 1352 (R.I. 1983).
Lerner v. Gill, 463 A.2d 1352 (R.I. 1983). “Any person, with the exception of a prisoner known as a "lifer" or a "habitual criminal" who is serving a single sentence, may, because of the provisions of § 13-8-9, be paroled after having served one-third of the sentence.”
Pine v. Clark, 636 A.2d 1319 (R.I. 1994). “See § 13-8-8. Special provisions, however, govern parole for prisoners subject to more than one sentence, life sentences, or lengthy sentences and for “habitual criminals.”
State v. O'rourke, 463 A.2d 1328 (R.I. 1983). “General Laws 1956 (1981 Reenactment) § 13-8-8 provides: “Whenever a person convicted of any offense shall be sentenced to be imprisoned in the adult correctional institutions for a period of more than six (6) months, his such sentence shall be subject to the control of the…”
State v. Rice, 811 A.2d 1144 (R.I. 2002). “General Laws 1956 § 13-8-8 provides: "Whenever a person convicted of any offense shall be sentenced to be imprisoned in the adult correctional institutions for a period of more than six (6) months, his or her sentence shall be subject to the control of the parole board as…”
Lerner v. Gill, 580 F. Supp. 1056 (D.R.I. 1984). “R.I. Gen.Laws § 13-8-8 provides that a prisoner’s sentence more than six (6) months "shall be subject to the control of the parole board as hereinafter provided.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.