Any person may kill any dog that suddenly assaults him or her or any person of his
or her family or in his or her company, while the person assaulted is out of the enclosure
of the owner or keeper of that dog and any person may kill any dog found out of the
enclosure of its owner or keeper, assaulting, wounding, or killing any cattle, sheep,
lamb, horse, hog, or fowl, not the property of its owner.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
2
cases, 1978–2011 · leading case:
State v. Goulet, 21 A.3d 302 (R.I. 2011).
State v. Goulet, 21 A.3d 302 (R.I. 2011).
· cites it 9× “5 First, defendant filed a motion to *306 dismiss count 1 on the theory that G.L. 1956 § 4-13-18 controlled, and that, as such, dismissal was proper as a matter of law.”
Bernhart v. Nine, 391 A.2d 75 (R.I. 1978).
“” Later, in I860, 3 the Legislature enacted a provision which now can be found in §4-13-18. It reads: “Any person may kill any dog that may suddenly assault him or any person of his family or in his company, while the person so assaulted is out of the enclosure of the owner or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.