Whenever the commission shall make a determination recommending the reprimand, censure,
suspension, immediate temporary suspension, removal, or retirement of a member of
the judiciary, it shall file forthwith a copy of the recommendation, certified by
the chairperson, together with the transcript and the findings and conclusions, with
the chief justice of the supreme court, and the commission shall forthwith give the
member of the judiciary written notice of the filing, together with a copy of its
findings and recommendations. The notice shall be mailed to the chambers of the judge
or to his or her last known place of residence or may be personally delivered to him
or her by a member of the commission. The transcript and the findings, conclusions,
and recommendation of the commission shall be public documents, except when they relate
to a hearing concerning a private reprimand pursuant to § 8-16-4(d), in which case they shall be kept confidential.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
4
cases, 1990–2001 · leading case:
In Re Lallo, 768 A.2d 921 (R.I. 2001).
In Re Lallo, 768 A.2d 921 (R.I. 2001).
· cites it 4× “Thus, § 8-16-5 provides as follows: “Whenever the commission shall make a determination recommending the reprimand, censure, suspension, immediate temporary suspension, removal, or retirement of a member of the judiciary, it shall file forthwith a copy of the recommendation,…”
Matter of Almeida, 611 A.2d 1375 (R.I. 1992).
“After further discovery and investigation, the commission issued its findings, conclusions, and recommendations in a report pursuant to § 8-16-5, as amended by P.L. 1987, ch. 492, § 1, and certified that report in order for this court to review its recommendations and to…”
In re the Comm'n on Jud. Tenure & Discipline Proceedings Against Almeida, 611 A.2d 1375 (R.I. 1992).
“After further discovery and investigation, the commission issued its findings, conclusions, and recommendations in a report pursuant to § 8-16-5, as amended by P.L.1987, ch. 492, § 1, and certified that report in order for this court to review its recommendations and to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.