Rhode Island General Laws
R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-1-45 (2026)
Attorney’s fees in breach of contract actions
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
RI-LEGwebserver.rilegislature.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The court may award a reasonable attorney’s fee to the prevailing party in any civil action arising from a breach of contract in which the court:
(1) Finds that there was a complete absence of a justiciable issue of either law or fact raised by the losing party; or
(2) Renders a default judgment against the losing party.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 36
cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1990–2025 · leading case: Kells v. Town of Lincoln, 874 A.2d 204 (R.I. 2005).
Kells v. Town of Lincoln, 874 A.2d 204 (R.I. 2005). “The defendants contend that the Superior Court erroneously granted summary judgment for the plaintiff, and improperly awarded attorney's fees to him in accordance with G.L.1956 § 9-1-45 for actions arising out of breach of contract.”
Women's Dev. Corp. v. City of Cent. Falls, 764 A.2d 151 (R.I. 2001). “After entry of the order granting the motion for judgment as a matter of law on the city’s breach-of-contract claims, the city moved for an award of attorney’s fees under G.L. 1956 § 9-1-45 (which allows an award of attorney’s fees for a party’s prosecution of nonjusticiable…”
Lucilio P. Furtado v. Maria Goncalves, as of the Est. of Alfredo D. Goncalves, 63 A.3d 533 (R.I. 2013). “The plaintiffs argue that the Superior Court erred in ordering them to execute general releases with terms that were materially different from those contemplated during settlement negotiations, and in assessing attorney’s fees under G.L.1956 § 9-1-45. This case came before the…”
Adp Marshall, Inc. v. Noresco, LLC, 710 F. Supp. 2d 197 (D.R.I. 2010). “17 Both parties have requested reasonable attorney’s fees pursuant to R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-1-45. *214 III. The Change Order Process Generally, the disagreements between Noresco and ADPM require discrete determinations of which party was responsible, under the Agreement, to perform…”
Sophie F. Danforth v. Timothy T. More, Nos, 129 A.3d 63 (R.I. 2016). “The parties do not dispute that § 9-1-45 provides an adequate basis for an award of attorney’s fees; thus, we review the trial justice’s decision denying such fees under an abuse of discretion rubric.”
Am. Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Stefania M. Mardo, as Tr. of the Constellation Trust—2011, 140 A.3d 106 (R.I. 2016). “Furthermore and critically, G.L. 1956 § 9-1-45 provides for an award of attorneys’ fees in contract actions7 and thus can be read as in derogation of the common law American rule.”
Ross-Simons of Warwick, Inc. v. Baccarat, Inc., 66 F. Supp. 2d 317 (D.R.I. 1999). “A court may award attorneys’ fees “to the prevailing party in any civil action arising from a breach of contract in which the court: (1) Finds that there was a complete absence of a justiciable issue of either the law or fact raised by the losing party; or (2) Renders a default…”
Greensleeves, Inc. v. Smiley, 942 A.2d 284 (R.I. 2007). “Subsequently, Greensleeves filed a motion with this Court seeking attorneys’ fees pursuant to G.L.1956 § 9-1-45; it contended that Mr. Friedrich’s appeal of the Superior Court's February 6, 1998 order had been frivolous.”
Mello v. DaLomba, 798 A.2d 405 (R.I. 2002). “In count 2 of his complaint, plaintiff seeks to recover attorneys’ fees under G.L. 1956 § 9-1-45 for the breach of contract claim in count 1.”
Marcia Sallum Glassie v. Paul Doucette, in his capacity as of the Est. of Donelson C. Glassie, Jr., 159 A.3d 88 (R.I. 2017). “Consequently, we find no basis under § 9-1-45 for an award of attorney’s fees.”
Doe v. Brown Univ., 210 F. Supp. 3d 310 (D.R.I. 2016). “2010) (emphasis added) (quoting R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-1-45). This case falls far short of meeting that high bar.”
Pearson v. Pearson, 11 A.3d 103 (R.I. 2011). “, G.L.1956 § 9-1-45 (“The court may award a reasonable attorney’s fee to the prevailing party in any civil action arising from a breach of contract * * *.”
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-1-45(1) — 8 cases
Sophie F. Danforth v. Timothy T. More, Nos, 129 A.3d 63 (R.I. 2016). “The parties do not dispute that § 9-1-45 provides an adequate basis for an award of attorney’s fees; thus, we review the trial justice’s decision denying such fees under an abuse of discretion rubric.”
Kells v. Town of Lincoln, 874 A.2d 204 (R.I. 2005). “The defendants contend that the Superior Court erroneously granted summary judgment for the plaintiff, and improperly awarded attorney's fees to him in accordance with G.L.1956 § 9-1-45 for actions arising out of breach of contract.”
Universal Truck & Equip. Co. v. Southworth-Milton, Inc., 765 F.3d 103 (1st Cir. 2014).
Mullowney v. Masopust, 943 A.2d 1029 (R.I. 2008).
Marcia Sallum Glassie v. Paul Doucette, in his capacity as of the Est. of Donelson C. Glassie, Jr., 159 A.3d 88 (R.I. 2017). “Consequently, we find no basis under § 9-1-45 for an award of attorney’s fees.”
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-1-45(2) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.