U.S.S.G. § 1B1.5

Read at: USSCussc.gov CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§1B1.5.     Interpretation of References to Other Offense Guidelines

(a)        A cross reference (an instruction to apply another offense guideline) refers to the entire offense guideline (i.e., the base offense level, specific offense characteristics, cross references, and special instructions).

(b)        (1)        An instruction to use the offense level from another offense guideline refers to the offense level from the entire offense guideline (i.e., the base offense level, specific offense characteristics, cross references, and special instructions), except as provided in subdivision (2) below.

(2)        An instruction to use a particular subsection or table from another offense guideline refers only to the particular subsection or table referenced, and not to the entire offense guideline.

(c)        If the offense level is determined by a reference to another guideline under subsection (a) or (b)(1) above, the adjustments in Chapter Three (Adjustments) also are determined in respect to the referenced offense guideline, except as otherwise expressly provided.

(d)        A reference to another guideline under subsection (a) or (b)(1) above may direct that it be applied only if it results in the greater offense level.  In such case, the greater offense level means the greater Chapter Two offense level, except as otherwise expressly provided.

 

Commentary

Application Notes:

1.         References to other offense guidelines are most frequently designated "Cross References," but may also appear in the portion of the guideline entitled "Base Offense Level" (e.g., §2D1.2(a)(1) and (2)), or "Specific Offense Characteristics" (e.g., §2A4.1(b)(7)).  These references may be to a specific guideline, or may be more general (e.g., to the guideline for the "underlying offense").  Such references incorporate the specific offense characteristics, cross references, and special instructions as well as the base offense level.  For example, if the guideline reads "2 plus the offense level from §2A2.2 (Aggravated Assault)," the user would determine the offense level from §2A2.2, including any applicable adjustments for planning, weapon use, degree of injury and motive, and then increase by 2 levels. 

A reference may also be to a specific subsection of another guideline; e.g., the reference in §2D1.10(a)(1) to "3 plus the offense level from the Drug Quantity Table in §2D1.1".  In such case, only the specific subsection of that other guideline is used.

2.         A reference to another guideline may direct that such reference is to be used only if it results in a greater offense level.  In such cases, the greater offense level means the offense level taking into account only the Chapter Two offense level, unless the offense guideline expressly provides for consideration of both the Chapter Two offense level and applicable Chapter Three adjustments.  For situations in which a comparison involving both Chapters Two and Three is necessary, see the Commentary to §§2C1.1 (Offering, Giving, Soliciting, or Receiving a Bribe; Extortion Under Color of Official Right; Fraud Involving the Deprivation of the Intangible Right to Honest Services of Public Officials; Conspiracy to Defraud by Interference with Governmental Functions); 2E1.1 (Unlawful Conduct Relating to Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations); and 2E1.2 (Interstate or Foreign Travel or Transportation in Aid of a Racketeering Enterprise).

3.         A reference may direct that, if the conduct involved another offense, the offense guideline for such other offense is to be applied.  Consistent with the provisions of §1B1.3 (Relevant Conduct), such other offense includes conduct that may be a state or local offense and conduct that occurred under circumstances that would constitute a federal offense had the conduct taken place within the territorial or maritime jurisdiction of the United States.  Where there is more than one such other offense, the most serious such offense (or group of closely related offenses in the case of offenses that would be grouped together under §3D1.2(d)) is to be used.  For example, if a defendant convicted of possession of a firearm by a felon, to which §2K2.1 (Unlawful Receipt, Possession, or Transportation of Firearms or Ammunition; Prohibited Transactions Involving Firearms or Ammunition) applies, is found to have possessed that firearm during commission of a series of offenses, the cross reference at §2K2.1(c) is applied to the offense resulting in the greatest offense level.

Historical Note:  Effective November 1, 1987. Amended effective November 1, 1989 (amendments 79 and 80); November 1, 1991 (amendment 429); November 1, 1992 (amendment 440); November 1, 1995 (amendment 534); November 1, 1997 (amendment 547); November 1, 2001 (amendment 616); November 1, 2004 (amendment 666).

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 61 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1991–2025 · leading case: United States v. Daniel Stanford, 883 F.3d 500 (5th Cir. 2018).
United States v. Daniel Stanford, 883 F.3d 500 (5th Cir. 2018). · cites it 3× “5 also provides that "[a] reference may direct that, if the conduct involved another offense guideline for such other offense is to be applied.”
United States v. Gay, 240 F.3d 1222 (10th Cir. 2001). · cites it 2× “See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.5. Mr. Gay asserts § 1B1.5 requires “that if a cross-reference to another [offense] guideline is used, then the entire [offense] guideline shall be used.”
United States v. Anderson, 526 F.3d 319 (6th Cir. 2008). · cites it 2× “The general application principle in U.S.S.G. § 1B1.5(b)(1) (2005) states that "[a]n instruction to use the offense level from another offense guideline refers to the offense level from the entire offense guideline (i.”
United States v. Robert Maloney, 406 F.3d 149 (2d Cir. 2005). · cites it 2× “” U.S.S.G. § 1B1.5. 4 Thus, through these various provisions, the Guidelines unmistakably provide that courts imposing sentences for offenses involving the willful failure to pay court-ordered child support under 18 U.”
United States v. Mark John Lamere, United States of Am. v. Jean-Paul Allen Lamere, 980 F.2d 506 (8th Cir. 1992). · cites it 2× “1991); see also U.S.S.G. § 1B1.5, comment (n. 1) (“A reference may also be to a specific subsection of another guideline.”
United States v. Lavont Flanders, Jr., 752 F.3d 1317 (11th Cir. 2014). “U.S.S.G. § 1B1.5(a). “Additionally, the [G]uidelines specifically instruct courts to take into consideration all relevant conduct when calculating the guideline range.”
United States v. Dean A. Lambey, 974 F.2d 1389 (4th Cir. 1992). “Furthermore, although we are required, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 1B1.5, to apply the entire guideline for the object offense "[ujnless otherwise expressly indicated,” U.”
United States v. Mary E. Warnick, 287 F.3d 299 (4th Cir. 2002). · cites it 3× “5 distinguishes between cross-references to an entire guideline and cross-references to a particular section within a guideline.”
United States v. Connolly, 341 F.3d 16 (1st Cir. 2003). “U.S.S.G. § 1B1.5, comment. (n.l). The PSR followed these directives to the letter.”
United States v. Milton Milan, 304 F.3d 273 (3rd Cir. 2002). “” See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.5 (defining a “cross reference” as “an instruction to apply another offense guideline”).”
United States v. Christopher Dickerson, United States of Am. v. Christopher Dickerson, 114 F.3d 464 (4th Cir. 1997). · cites it 2× “1996) (citing U.S.S.G. § 1B1.5 comment, (n.3) — “where cross-referencing required, and more than one offense applicable, the most serious offense is to be used.”
United States v. Vicente Cuevas-Lopez, 934 F.3d 1056 (9th Cir. 2019). “” U.S.S.G. § 1B1.5(b)(2). Section 4A1.2 is not, however, an offense guideline— rather, it provides “Definitions and Instructions for Computing Criminal History.”
— U.S.S.G. §1B1.5(a) — 11 cases
United States v. Lavont Flanders, Jr., 752 F.3d 1317 (11th Cir. 2014). “U.S.S.G. § 1B1.5(a). “Additionally, the [G]uidelines specifically instruct courts to take into consideration all relevant conduct when calculating the guideline range.”
United States v. Cervantes-Chavez, 59 F. Supp. 3d 1295 (D.N.M. 2014).
Koon v. United States, 518 U.S. 81 (1996).
United States v. Rico Green (4th Cir. 2019).
— U.S.S.G. §1B1.5(b)(1) — 4 cases
United States v. Anderson, 526 F.3d 319 (6th Cir. 2008). “The general application principle in U.S.S.G. § 1B1.5(b)(1) (2005) states that "[a]n instruction to use the offense level from another offense guideline refers to the offense level from the entire offense guideline (i.”
United States v. Warnick (4th Cir. 2002).
United States v. Anderson (6th Cir. 2008).
United States v. Pun Hodge (7th Cir. 2009).
— U.S.S.G. §1B1.5(b)(2) — 6 cases
United States v. Vicente Cuevas-Lopez, 934 F.3d 1056 (9th Cir. 2019). “” U.S.S.G. § 1B1.5(b)(2). Section 4A1.2 is not, however, an offense guideline— rather, it provides “Definitions and Instructions for Computing Criminal History.”
United States v. Laihben, 167 F.3d 1364 (11th Cir. 1999).
United States v. Warnick (4th Cir. 2002).
United States v. Laihben, 167 F.3d 1364 (11th Cir. 1999).
United States v. Meehan (4th Cir. 2000).
— U.S.S.G. §1B1.5(c) — 5 cases
United States v. Anderson, 526 F.3d 319 (6th Cir. 2008). “The general application principle in U.S.S.G. § 1B1.5(b)(1) (2005) states that "[a]n instruction to use the offense level from another offense guideline refers to the offense level from the entire offense guideline (i.”
United States v. Okulaja, 21 F.4th 338 (5th Cir. 2021).
United States v. Anderson (6th Cir. 2008).
— U.S.S.G. §1B1.5(d) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.