Tennessee Code Annotated
Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-23-202 (2026)
Contents of application for injunction
✓ current as of May 2026
The party applying for relief in such case shall distinctly state how, when, and to whom the debt or any part of the debt secured aforementioned has been paid, or any circumstances of fraud which vitiate the contract.
Acts 1873, ch. 10, § 2; Shan., § 6250; Code 1932, § 10536; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 23-2402.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1995–2020 · leading case: Collins v. Greene Cnty. Bank, 916 S.W.2d 941 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995).
Collins v. Greene Cnty. Bank, 916 S.W.2d 941 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995). “T.C.A. 29-23-202 (1980) (emphasis added).”
Gibson v. Mortg. Elec. Reg. Sys., Inc., 23 F. Supp. 3d 895 (W.D. Tenn. 2014). “” 62 What is more, section 29-23-202 requires the party seeking the injunction to “distinctly state how, when, and to whom the debt or any part of the *914 debt secured aforementioned has been paid, or any circumstances of fraud which vitiate the contract.”
Muhammad v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., as Tr. for FFMLT 2007-FFB-SS, Mortg. Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-FFB-SS (W.D. Tenn. 2020). “§ 35-5-116(e) does not prohibit Plaintiff from seeking an injunction under T.C.A. § 29-23-202 against Mackie Wolf, this claim fails as a matter of law.”
Betty Jo Goodman v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). “5 5 The chancery court did not specifically rely on Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-23-202 in determining that the petition should be dismissed pursuant to Rule 12.”
Edward Faria v. Wilson & Assocs., PLLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-23-202 (2014); see also Daunhauer v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.