Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-2-415 (2026)

Foster parents' rights

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 996,s 24, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 263, s 12, eff. 7/1/2023.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 187, s 12, eff. 7/1/2023.

Amended by 2022 Tenn. Acts, ch. 956, s 1, eff. 4/29/2022.

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 199, s 3, eff. 7/1/2015.

Acts 1997 , ch. 549, §§ 2, 3; 1999, ch. 493, §§ 1, 2; 1999, ch. 508, §§ 4, 10, 11; 2000, ch. 981, § 51; 2002, ch. 629, § 7; 2004, ch. 877, § 1; 2005, ch. 265, § 6; 2008 , ch. 796, § 1; 2009 , ch. 270, § 1; 2011 , ch. 410, § 3(i).


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2002–2023 · leading case: Sheila Mikel v. Margie Quin, 58 F.4th 252 (6th Cir. 2023).
Sheila Mikel v. Margie Quin, 58 F.4th 252 (6th Cir. 2023). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-2-415 (a)(16); Tenn.”
Melton v. Medeiros (M.D. Tenn. 2020). · cites it 4× “Melton cites several subsections of Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-2-415 that she says “required [Defendants] to inform Mrs.”
In Re Devon W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 6× “Whether Appellants were denied fundamental rights guaranteed to foster parents in Tenn. Code Ann. §37-2-415 (a)(1,2,4,6,11-20) in the trial court upholding the final adoption decree.”
Sheila Mikel v. Tennessee Dep't Of Child.'s Servs. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-2-415 (16). Advance notice of the intent to remove a child from a foster home shall not be required when the Department determines that there is an imminent threat of harm to the child’s health or safety if he is not removed from the foster family home…”
Michael Baral v. George Joshua Bombard (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “Bombard argues the rights of foster parents, as set forth in T.C.A. § 37-2-415 and 416, are extremely limited and do not contemplate enforcement of a Plan of Care.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.