Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-301 (2026)

Arson

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2020 Tenn. Acts, ch. 810, s 2, eff. 10/1/2020.

Amended by 2020 Tenn. Acts, ch. 810, s 1, eff. 10/1/2020.

Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 1; 1991, ch. 19, § 1; 1997 , ch. 284, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 79 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1996–2024 · leading case: State v. Lewis, 958 S.W.2d 736 (Tenn. 1997).
State v. Lewis, 958 S.W.2d 736 (Tenn. 1997). · cites it 5× “Because we find that the word “structure,” as used in Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-14-301 (1991), means the entire structure, and because Lewis burned a portion of a single structure in the course of one arsonous act, only one count of aggravated arson can successfully withstand double…”
State v. Gann, 251 S.W.3d 446 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “” T.C.A. § 39-14-301 (1997). “A person commits arson who knowingly damages any personal property, .”
State of Tennessee v. Benjamin Foust, 482 S.W.3d 20 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). · cites it 3× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-301 (a)(1). Also, as applicable to our review, it is an offense for a person to “knowingly damage any personal property, land, or other property, except buildings or structures covered under § 39-H-301, by means of fire or explosion .”
State v. Zeolia, 928 S.W.2d 457 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-14-301(b)(1991). For each count, the appellant was sentenced as a range I standard offender to five years incarceration with the Tennessee Department of Correction.”
State v. Winningham, 958 S.W.2d 740 (Tenn. 1997). · cites it 2× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-14-301(a) (1991). Clearly, both statutes contain elements which the other does *746 not; in fact, they have no common elements.”
State v. Franklin, 130 S.W.3d 789 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2003). “§ 39-14-301(a) (1991) (emphasis added). Determining that the key phrase “any structure” referred to the entire structure which contained the individual apartments, rather than to the individual component parts of the single building, the court held that the proper unit of…”
State v. Caldwell, 977 S.W.2d 110 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997). “Tennessee Code Annotated § 39-14-301 states that “[a] person commits an offense who knowingly damages any structure by means of fire or explosion: (l)without the consent of all persons who have a possessory, proprietary or security interest therein.”
United States v. John Laton, 352 F.3d 286 (6th Cir. 2003). “§ 844 (i) (providing for a five-year minimum sentence and twenty-year maximum sentence under these circumstances), with Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 39-14-301(b)(l), 40-35-111(b)(3) (providing for a shorter three-year minimum sentence and fifteen-year maximum sentence under these…”
S. Trust Ins. Co. v. Matthew Phillips, 474 S.W.3d 660 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015). “§ 39-14-408 (defining the offense of vandalism); § 39-14-301 (defining -the offense of arson).”
State v. Nelson, 23 S.W.3d 270 (Tenn. 2000). “The aggravated arson statute at issue in this case provides: A person commits aggravated arson who commits arson as defined in § 39-14-301 or 39-14-303 ... [w]hen any person, including firefighters and law enforcement officials, suffers serious bodily injury as a result of the…”
United States v. Mitchell, 218 F. Supp. 3d 360 (M.D. Penn. 2016). · cites it 2× “§ 16-11-110 ; Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-301 ; Utah Code Ann, § 76-6-102; Vt.”
United States v. Carlos Fallins, 777 F.3d 296 (6th Cir. 2015). · cites it 2× “*299 Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-14-301. Arson of personal property or real estate is defined as: (a) A person commits arson who knowingly damages any personal property, land,'or other property, except buildings or structures covered under § 39-14-301, by means of a fire or explosion:…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-301(a) — 9 cases
State v. Lewis, 958 S.W.2d 736 (Tenn. 1997). “Because we find that the word “structure,” as used in Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-14-301 (1991), means the entire structure, and because Lewis burned a portion of a single structure in the course of one arsonous act, only one count of aggravated arson can successfully withstand double…”
State v. Winningham, 958 S.W.2d 740 (Tenn. 1997). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-14-301(a) (1991). Clearly, both statutes contain elements which the other does *746 not; in fact, they have no common elements.”
State v. Franklin, 130 S.W.3d 789 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2003). “§ 39-14-301(a) (1991) (emphasis added). Determining that the key phrase “any structure” referred to the entire structure which contained the individual apartments, rather than to the individual component parts of the single building, the court held that the proper unit of…”
State of Tennessee v. James Rodney Smith (Tenn. Crim. App. 2022).
State of Tennessee v. Angela Kilgore (Tenn. Crim. App. 2021).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-301(a)(1) — 11 cases
State of Tennessee v. James Rodney Smith (Tenn. Crim. App. 2022).
State of Tennessee v. Benjamin Foust (Tenn. Crim. App. 2019).
State of Tennessee v.Michael A. Virga (Tenn. Crim. App. 2009).
State of Tennessee v. Terrance Patterson (Tenn. Crim. App. 2007).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-301(a)(2) — 2 cases
State of Tennessee v. Theresa Hallsford (Tenn. Crim. App. 2002).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-301(b)(1) — 2 cases
State of Tennessee v. Otis B. Owens (Tenn. Crim. App. 2012).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-301(b)(1991) — 1 case
State v. Zeolia, 928 S.W.2d 457 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1996). “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-14-301(b)(1991). For each count, the appellant was sentenced as a range I standard offender to five years incarceration with the Tennessee Department of Correction.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-301(b)(l) — 1 case
United States v. John Laton, 352 F.3d 286 (6th Cir. 2003). “§ 844 (i) (providing for a five-year minimum sentence and twenty-year maximum sentence under these circumstances), with Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 39-14-301(b)(l), 40-35-111(b)(3) (providing for a shorter three-year minimum sentence and fifteen-year maximum sentence under these…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.