Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-402 (2026)

Definitions for this part and title 53, chapter 11, parts 3 and 4

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this part and title 53, chapter 11, parts 3 and 4, unless the context otherwise requires:

Amended by 2022 Tenn. Acts, ch. 804, s 1, eff. 7/1/2022.

Amended by 2022 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1054, s 1, eff. 5/25/2022.

Amended by 2022 Tenn. Acts, ch. 764, s 1, eff. 3/31/2022.

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 577, s 3, eff. 5/27/2021.

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 230, s 1, eff. 4/22/2021.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 87, s 1, eff. 4/4/2019.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1041, s 1, eff. 7/1/2018.

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 120, s 1, eff. 4/12/2017.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1083, s 1, eff. 5/20/2016.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 873, s 2, eff. 7/1/2016.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 873, s 1, eff. 7/1/2016.

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 352, s 1, eff. 5/4/2015.

Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 1; 1993, ch. 295, § 8; 2005, ch. 18, § 9; 2010 , ch. 1100, § 65; 2012 , ch. 575, § 2; 2012 , ch. 848, § 97; 2014 , ch. 916, § 1; 2014, ch. 936, § 1; 2015 , ch. 352, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 142 cases (37 in the last 5 years), 1992–2026 · leading case: United States v. Willie Garth, 965 F.3d 493 (6th Cir. 2020).
United States v. Willie Garth, 965 F.3d 493 (6th Cir. 2020). · cites it 3× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-402 (6). And intent to deliver “may be inferred from the amount of a controlled substance or substances possessed by an offender, along with other relevant facts surrounding the arrest[.”
United States v. Angelo Goldston, 906 F.3d 390 (6th Cir. 2018). · cites it 4× “" Tenn. Code § 39-17-402 (1). And a "practitioner" is a person who is " permitted to .”
State v. Blair, 145 S.W.3d 633 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2004). · cites it 8× “See T.C.A. § 39-17-402(13) (providing that an “immediate precursor” is a “substance which the commissioner of mental health and developmental disabilities .”
United States v. Jeffery Havis, 927 F.3d 382 (6th Cir. 2019). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-402 (6). The question before the court, then, is whether the definition of "controlled substance offense" in § 4B1.”
State v. Patterson, 966 S.W.2d 435 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997). · cites it 3× “1984); 8 see Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 39-17-402(14), 39-17-418.”
United States v. Havis, 929 F.3d 317 (6th Cir. 2019). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-402 (6). The guidelines meanwhile define a controlled substance offense as one "that prohibits the manufacture, import, export, distribution, or dispensing" of drugs (or possessing drugs with intent to do the same).”
State v. Thornton, 10 S.W.3d 229 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-402(6). Because the defendant is blind, he might require assistance in an illegal drug transaction.”
State v. Belew, 348 S.W.3d 186 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “According to Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-17-402(6), “deliver” is defined as “the actual, constructive, or at *190 tempted transfer from one person to another of a controlled substance.”
State v. Mallard, 40 S.W.3d 473 (Tenn. 2001). “The full text of the statute, which has not been amended since its original enactment, reads as follows: In determining whether a particular object is drug paraphernalia as defined by § 39-17-402, the court or other authority making such a determination shall in addition to all…”
Abdur'Rahman v. Bredesen, 181 S.W.3d 292 (Tenn. 2005). “§ 39-17-402(7). The Pharmacy Practice Act requires that persons who prescribe or dispense sodium Pentothal or other controlled substances comply with annual registration requirements.”
State of Tennessee v. Phillip Pack, 421 S.W.3d 629 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “” T.C.A. § 39-17-402(9). “Proximate cause is that which, in a natural and continual sequence, unbroken by any new, independent cause produces the injury, and without which the injury would not have occurred.”
Jones v. Greene, 946 S.W.2d 817 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “Acts 1169, 1254 (presently codified at Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-402(4) (Supp.1996)).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-402(1) — 2 cases
United States v. Alexander Coleman, 977 F.3d 666 (8th Cir. 2020).
Wilson v. United States (M.D. Tenn. 2020).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-402(12) — 7 cases
State v. Transou, 928 S.W.2d 949 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1996).
State of Tennessee v. Tyson Reed King (Tenn. Crim. App. 2018).
State of Tennessee v. John Edward Roach (Tenn. Crim. App. 2025).
State of Tennessee v. Greg Harris (Tenn. Crim. App. 2005).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-402(13) — 2 cases
State v. Blair, 145 S.W.3d 633 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2004). “See T.C.A. § 39-17-402(13) (providing that an “immediate precursor” is a “substance which the commissioner of mental health and developmental disabilities .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-402(14) — 4 cases
State v. Patterson, 966 S.W.2d 435 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997). “1984); 8 see Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 39-17-402(14), 39-17-418.”
State v. Valentine, 911 S.W.2d 328 (Tenn. 1995).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-402(15) — 4 cases
Hill v. Lawson, 851 S.W.2d 822 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992).
State of Tennessee. v. Dwight J. Shankle (Tenn. Crim. App. 2010).
State of Tennessee v. Raymond Lee Gibson (Tenn. Crim. App. 2007).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-402(16) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. James Tilson (Tenn. Crim. App. 2012).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-402(16)(A) — 3 cases
Hembrook v. Seiber (M.D. Tenn. 2022).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-402(16)(C) — 2 cases
Hembrook v. Seiber (M.D. Tenn. 2022).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-402(17) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-402(4) — 6 cases
State v. Blair, 145 S.W.3d 633 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2004). “See T.C.A. § 39-17-402(13) (providing that an “immediate precursor” is a “substance which the commissioner of mental health and developmental disabilities .”
Jones v. Greene, 946 S.W.2d 817 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996). “Acts 1169, 1254 (presently codified at Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-402(4) (Supp.1996)).”
State of Tennessee v. Garrick Graham (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016).
State of Tennessee v. Seth Powell (Tenn. Crim. App. 2024).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-402(6) — 45 cases
State v. Thornton, 10 S.W.3d 229 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-402(6). Because the defendant is blind, he might require assistance in an illegal drug transaction.”
State v. Belew, 348 S.W.3d 186 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2005). “According to Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-17-402(6), “deliver” is defined as “the actual, constructive, or at *190 tempted transfer from one person to another of a controlled substance.”
State v. Baldwin, 867 S.W.2d 358 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1993).
United States v. Alexander Coleman, 977 F.3d 666 (8th Cir. 2020).
Wilson v. United States (M.D. Tenn. 2020).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-402(6)(2018) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Robert Glen Gray (Tenn. Crim. App. 2020).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-402(7) — 5 cases
Abdur'Rahman v. Bredesen, 181 S.W.3d 292 (Tenn. 2005). “§ 39-17-402(7). The Pharmacy Practice Act requires that persons who prescribe or dispense sodium Pentothal or other controlled substances comply with annual registration requirements.”
United States v. Angelo Goldston, 906 F.3d 390 (6th Cir. 2018). “" Tenn. Code § 39-17-402 (1). And a "practitioner" is a person who is " permitted to .”
State of Tennessee v. Anthony Brown (Tenn. Crim. App. 2012).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-402(9) — 4 cases
United States v. Angelo Goldston, 906 F.3d 390 (6th Cir. 2018). “" Tenn. Code § 39-17-402 (1). And a "practitioner" is a person who is " permitted to .”
State of Tennessee v. Phillip Pack, 421 S.W.3d 629 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2013). “” T.C.A. § 39-17-402(9). “Proximate cause is that which, in a natural and continual sequence, unbroken by any new, independent cause produces the injury, and without which the injury would not have occurred.”
Wilson v. United States (M.D. Tenn. 2020).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.