Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-14-201 (2026)

Part definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this part, unless the context otherwise requires:

Acts 1965, ch. 217, § 1; T.C.A., § 40-2014.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases, 1986–2018 · leading case: Owens v. State, 908 S.W.2d 923 (Tenn. 1995).
Owens v. State, 908 S.W.2d 923 (Tenn. 1995). · cites it 12× “§§ 40-30-101 through XX-XX-XXX (1981) and the statutes relating to compensation of counsel were recodified as Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 40-14-201 through XX-XX-XXX (1981).”
State v. David H., 247 S.W.3d 651 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 5× “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-14-201. Whether an income in excess of $40,000 a year obviated the need for the trial court to make additional inquiries may be subject to disagreement by reasonable people.”
Allen v. McWilliams, 715 S.W.2d 28 (Tenn. 1986). · cites it 2× “Where such finding has been made and the accused has not competently waived his right to counsel, T.C.A. § 40-14-202(a) provides that the court shall appoint either the Public Defender, if there is one in the county, or a qualified licensed attorney to represent the accused.”
Huskey v. State, 743 S.W.2d 609 (Tenn. 1988). · cites it 2× “T.C.A. §§ 40-14-201 to 210. 2 . E.g., Allen v.”
Oudon Panyananouvong v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2001). · cites it 3× “" Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-14-201 (1); State v.”
Melanie Gayle King (Lyon) v. James David King (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “”4 Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-14-201 . Section One of Tenn.”
State of Tennessee, Dep't of Child.'s Servs. v. D.H. - Dissenting (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-14-201 . Whether an income in excess of $40,000 a year obviated the need for the trial court to make additional inquiries may be subject to disagreement by reasonable people.”
State of Tennessee, Dep't of Child.'s Servs. v. RDV (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. §40-14-202 . Further, Tenn.”
David Stovall v. Christopher Dunn (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “§ 8-14-209 (1993) because he was acting as a “public defender” as defined in Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-14-201 (1997). II. MR.”
State of Tennessee v. William Ramsey (Tenn. Crim. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-14-201 defines an “indigent person,” for the purposes of determining whether counsel should be appointed, as one “who does not possess sufficient means to pay reasonable compensation for the services of a competent attorney[.”
State of Tennessee v. Robert Miller (Tenn. Crim. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-14-202, which governs court appointment of counsel for indigent defendants, provides in pertinent part as follows: (a) In all felony cases, if the accused is not represented by counsel, and the court determines by the manner provided in…”
Jackie William Crowe v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-14-201 (1997). In other words, when the record on appeal showed that the court below found the criminal defendant or petitioner-appellant to be indigent, as a dispensation we have often excused the appellant from paying appellate court costs, even if this…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.