Tennessee Code Annotated
Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-29-105 (2026)
Felons convicted of infamous crimes - Dates
✓ current as of May 2026
- (a) The provisions and procedures provided for in §§ 40-29-101 - 40-29-104 shall apply to all persons convicted of an infamous crime prior to July 2, 1986.
- (b) For all persons convicted of infamous crimes after July 1, 1986, but before July 1, 1996, the following procedures shall apply:
- (1) A person rendered infamous or deprived of the rights of citizenship by the judgment of any state or federal court may have full rights of citizenship restored upon:
- (A) Receiving a pardon, except where the pardon contains special conditions pertaining to the right to suffrage;
- (B) Service or expiration of the maximum sentence imposed for the infamous crime; or
- (C) Being granted final release from incarceration or supervision by the board of parole, or county correction authority;
- (2) A person rendered infamous after July 1, 1986, by virtue of being convicted of one (1) of the following crimes shall never be eligible to register and vote in this state:
- (A) First degree murder;
- (B) Aggravated rape;
- (C) Treason; or
- (D) Voter fraud.
- (3) Any person eligible for restoration of citizenship pursuant to subdivision (b)(1) may request, and then shall be issued, a certificate of restoration upon a form prescribed by the coordinator of elections, by:
- (A) The pardoning authority; or
- (B) An agent or officer of the supervising or incarcerating authority;
- (4) Any authority issuing a certificate of restoration shall forward a copy of the certificate to the coordinator of elections;
- (5) Any person issued a certificate of restoration shall submit, to the administrator of elections of the county in which the person is eligible to vote, the certificate and upon verification of the certificate with the coordinator of elections be issued a voter registration card entitling the person to vote; and
- (6) A certificate of restoration issued pursuant to subdivision (b)(3) shall be sufficient proof to the administrator of elections that the person fulfills the requirements provided in subdivision (b)(1); however, before allowing a person convicted of an infamous crime to become a registered voter, it is the duty of the administrator of elections in each county to verify with the coordinator of elections that the person is eligible to register under this section.
- (1) A person rendered infamous or deprived of the rights of citizenship by the judgment of any state or federal court may have full rights of citizenship restored upon:
- (c) The following procedure shall apply to a person rendered infamous by virtue of being convicted of a felony on or after July 1, 1996:
- (1) Except as provided in subdivision (c)(2)(B), a person rendered infamous or whose rights of citizenship have been deprived by the judgment of a state or federal court may seek restoration of full rights of citizenship by petitioning the circuit court of the county where the petitioner resides or where the conviction for the infamous crime occurred;
- (2)
- (A) A person receiving a pardon that restores full rights of citizenship may petition for restoration immediately upon receiving the pardon. However, the court shall not have the authority or jurisdiction to alter, delete or render void special conditions pertaining to the right of suffrage that may be contained in the pardon;
- (B) A person convicted of an infamous crime may petition for restoration upon the expiration of the maximum sentence imposed by the court for the infamous crime; provided, that a person convicted of murder, rape, treason or voter fraud shall never be eligible to register and vote in this state;
- (3) The petition shall set forth the basis for the petitioner's eligibility for restoration and shall state the reasons the petitioner believes that petitioner's full citizenship rights should be restored. The petition shall be accompanied by the certified records, statements and other documents or information necessary to demonstrate to the court that the petitioner is both eligible for and merits having full rights of citizenship restored. The court may require any additional proof as it deems necessary to reach a just decision on the petition. There is a presumption that a petition filed pursuant to this subsection (c) shall be granted and that the full citizenship rights of the petitioner shall be restored. This presumption may only be overcome upon proof by a preponderance of the evidence that either the petitioner is not eligible for restoration or there is otherwise good cause to deny the petition;
- (4)
- (A) Prior to acting on any petition filed pursuant to this subsection (c), the court shall notify the district attorney general in whose county the petitioner resides and the district attorney general of the county in which the conviction occurred that a petition for restoration of citizenship has been filed by the petitioner. The notice shall be sent at least thirty (30) days prior to any hearing on or disposition of the petition. Each district attorney general so notified may object to the restoration of the petitioner's citizenship rights either in person or in writing;
- (B) If the petitioner was rendered infamous or deprived of citizenship rights by judgment of a federal court, the circuit court shall give the notice required in subdivision (c)(2)(A) to the United States attorney and the district attorney general in whose district the petitioner is currently residing. Each such official shall have the same right to object to the petition as is provided in subdivision (c)(2)(A);
- (5) If, upon the face of the petition or after conducting a hearing, the court finds that the petitioner's full citizenship rights should be restored, it shall so order and send a copy of the order to the state coordinator of elections;
- (6) All costs for a proceeding under this subsection (c) to restore a person's citizenship rights shall be paid by the petitioner unless the court specifically orders otherwise; and
- (7) Any person whose citizenship rights have been restored by order of the court pursuant to this subsection (c) shall submit a certified copy of the order to the administrator of elections of the county in which the person is eligible to vote. The administrator of elections shall verify with the coordinator of elections that the order was issued and, upon receiving the verification, shall issue the person a voter registration card entitling the person to vote.
Acts 1986, ch. 906, § 1; 1989, ch. 227, § 51; 1996, ch. 898, §§ 1, 2; 1998, ch. 1049, § 41.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1992–2024 · leading case: State v. Johnson, 79 S.W.3d 522 (Tenn. 2002).
State v. Johnson, 79 S.W.3d 522 (Tenn. 2002). “For convictions after July 1, 1986 but before July 1, 1996, a person may petition for restoration based on a pardon, service or expiration of the maximum sentence for the offense, or “final release” from incarceration or supervision.”
United States v. White, 808 F. Supp. 586 (M.D. Tenn. 1992). “” It states that all such persons who have received an unconditional pardon, who have served their sentence for the infamous crime, or who have been granted final release from incarceration or supervision by the board of parole or the department of correction may have their full…”
Billy Walker v. United States, 800 F.3d 720 (6th Cir. 2015). “restored pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-29-105 .” The same court issued a second order on March 22, 2012, confirming the restoration of rights in the prior order, and clarifying that Walker “shall have the explicit right to bear and possess firearms.”
John N. Moffitt v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). “T.C.A. § 40-29-105 (c)(2)(b) provides: A person convicted of an infamous crime may petition for restoration upon the expiration of the maximum sentence imposed by the court for the infamous crime; provided, that a person convicted of murder, rape, treason or voter fraud shall…”
State v. David Black (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “However, the District Attorney General (“State”) filed a Motion to Set Aside the Order because he was not notified by the trial court of the petition as mandated by Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-29-105 (c)(4)(A) and, therefore, could not oppose it.”
Gregory L. Smith v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-29-105 (b)(3). The authority issuing the certificate was required to send a copy to the coordinator of elections.”
State of Tennessee v. Jason Kevin Dedreux (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-29-105 (c)(2)(B). The petition must: (1) be filed either in the circuit court of the county where the petitioner resides or the county where the conviction for the crime occurred, (2) “set forth the basis for the petitioner’s eligibility for restoration,”…”
Tino C. Sutton v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024). “” See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-29-105 (c)(3) (West August 5, 2013, to current).”
State of Tennessee v. John Edward Johnson, Jr. (Tenn. Crim. App. 2001). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-29-105 (b)(1) (Supp.”
State of Tennessee v. Roscoe Dixon (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-29-105 (outlining the various types of restoration procedure applicable based upon the date of “conviction,” but stating that the deprivation takes place at the time of judgment rather than verdict).”
State of Tennessee v. John Edward Johnson, Jr. - Dissenting (Tenn. Crim. App. 2001). “§ 40-29-105 (restoration of right to vote); TENN.”
State v. Glenn A. Saddler (Tenn. Crim. App. 2000). “§ 40-29-105(b), the applicable statute, does not speak of “credibility” or honesty.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-29-105(b) — 3 cases
State v. Johnson, 79 S.W.3d 522 (Tenn. 2002). “For convictions after July 1, 1986 but before July 1, 1996, a person may petition for restoration based on a pardon, service or expiration of the maximum sentence for the offense, or “final release” from incarceration or supervision.”
Gregory L. Smith v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-29-105 (b)(3). The authority issuing the certificate was required to send a copy to the coordinator of elections.”
State v. Glenn A. Saddler (Tenn. Crim. App. 2000). “§ 40-29-105(b), the applicable statute, does not speak of “credibility” or honesty.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-29-105(b)(1) — 1 case
United States v. White, 808 F. Supp. 586 (M.D. Tenn. 1992). “” It states that all such persons who have received an unconditional pardon, who have served their sentence for the infamous crime, or who have been granted final release from incarceration or supervision by the board of parole or the department of correction may have their full…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-29-105(b)(1)(C) — 1 case
Gregory L. Smith v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-29-105 (b)(3). The authority issuing the certificate was required to send a copy to the coordinator of elections.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-29-105(b)(2) — 3 cases
United States v. White, 808 F. Supp. 586 (M.D. Tenn. 1992). “” It states that all such persons who have received an unconditional pardon, who have served their sentence for the infamous crime, or who have been granted final release from incarceration or supervision by the board of parole or the department of correction may have their full…”
John N. Moffitt v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). “T.C.A. § 40-29-105 (c)(2)(b) provides: A person convicted of an infamous crime may petition for restoration upon the expiration of the maximum sentence imposed by the court for the infamous crime; provided, that a person convicted of murder, rape, treason or voter fraud shall…”
State of Tennessee v. John Edward Johnson, Jr. - Dissenting (Tenn. Crim. App. 2001). “§ 40-29-105 (restoration of right to vote); TENN.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-29-105(b)(3) — 2 cases
United States v. White, 808 F. Supp. 586 (M.D. Tenn. 1992). “” It states that all such persons who have received an unconditional pardon, who have served their sentence for the infamous crime, or who have been granted final release from incarceration or supervision by the board of parole or the department of correction may have their full…”
Gregory L. Smith v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-29-105 (b)(3). The authority issuing the certificate was required to send a copy to the coordinator of elections.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-29-105(c) — 4 cases
State v. Johnson, 79 S.W.3d 522 (Tenn. 2002). “For convictions after July 1, 1986 but before July 1, 1996, a person may petition for restoration based on a pardon, service or expiration of the maximum sentence for the offense, or “final release” from incarceration or supervision.”
John N. Moffitt v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). “T.C.A. § 40-29-105 (c)(2)(b) provides: A person convicted of an infamous crime may petition for restoration upon the expiration of the maximum sentence imposed by the court for the infamous crime; provided, that a person convicted of murder, rape, treason or voter fraud shall…”
Gregory L. Smith v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-29-105 (b)(3). The authority issuing the certificate was required to send a copy to the coordinator of elections.”
Tino C. Sutton v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024). “” See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-29-105 (c)(3) (West August 5, 2013, to current).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-29-105(c)(2)(B) — 2 cases
State v. Johnson, 79 S.W.3d 522 (Tenn. 2002). “For convictions after July 1, 1986 but before July 1, 1996, a person may petition for restoration based on a pardon, service or expiration of the maximum sentence for the offense, or “final release” from incarceration or supervision.”
John N. Moffitt v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). “T.C.A. § 40-29-105 (c)(2)(b) provides: A person convicted of an infamous crime may petition for restoration upon the expiration of the maximum sentence imposed by the court for the infamous crime; provided, that a person convicted of murder, rape, treason or voter fraud shall…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-29-105(c)(4)(A) — 1 case
Tino C. Sutton v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024). “” See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-29-105 (c)(3) (West August 5, 2013, to current).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.