Tenn. Code Ann. » Tenn. Code / Title 5 / Chapter 14 / Part 1
Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 5-14-101 (2024)

Short title

✓ Justia copy: laws through about 2024 (2025 and 2026 sessions missing)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This part shall be known and may be cited as the "County Purchasing Law of 1957."

Acts 1957, ch. 312, § 1; T.C.A., § 5-1401.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1981–2020 · leading case: State ex rel. Leech v. Wright, 622 S.W.2d 807 (Tenn. 1981).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State ex rel. Leech v. Wright, 622 S.W.2d 807 (Tenn. 1981). · cites it 2× “Thus, we hold that the minimum requirements for complying with the private act applicable to defendant are as follows: notification to interested bidders by a method designed to reach bidders likely to be interested, either by direct mail, newspaper advertising, posting of…”
State v. Whitehead, 43 S.W.3d 921 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2000). “§§ 5-14-101 through 5-14-116 (1998) (“the 1957 Act”); the County Financial Management System of 1981, Tenn.”
Barker Bros. Waste v. Dyer Cnty. Legislative Body, 923 F. Supp. 1042 (W.D. Tenn. 1996). · cites it 2× “Plaintiffs also allege that Dyer County violated various Tennessee statutes regulating competitive bidding processes and exclusive franchises, specifically T.C.A. §§ 5-14-101 et seq., 6-2-201(12), and 5-1-118.”
Waste Servs. of Decatur, LLC v. Cnty. of Lawrence, No. M2011-01947-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Aug. 14, 2012). · cites it 2× “Tennessee Code Annotated § 5-14-108(a)(1) provides, in pertinent part, as follows: All purchases of and contracts for purchases of supplies, materials, equipment and contractual services, and all contracts for the lease or rental of equipment, and all sales of county-owned…”
Pamela Cotham v. Nicholas Jay Yeager, 607 S.W.3d 820 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). “Cotham stated that Securus was the winning bidder when bids for such telephone services were solicited by the County and that the resulting contract was properly approved and filed pursuant to the provisions of the County Purchasing Law of 1957, codified at Tennessee Code…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.