Tennessee Code Annotated
Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-50-351 (2026)
License to be carried and exhibited on demand - Arrest and penalty for violations
✓ current as of May 2026
- (a) Every licensee shall have the licensee's license in immediate possession at all times when operating a motor vehicle and shall display it upon demand of any officer or agent of the department or any police officer of the state, county or municipality, except that where the licensee has previously deposited the license with the officer or court demanding bail, and has received a receipt from the officer or the court, the receipt is to serve as a substitute for the license until the specified date for court appearance of licensee or the license is otherwise returned to the licensee by the officer or court accepting the license for deposit. Any peace officer, field deputy, or inspector of the department, or any other law enforcement officer of this state or municipality thereof, has the right to demand the exhibition of the license of any operator of a motorscooter as described in § 55-8-101, and effect the arrest of any person so found to be in violation of this section.
- (b) A violation of this section is a Class C misdemeanor.
Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 100, s 17, eff. 7/1/2024.
Acts 1937, ch. 90, § 8; impl. am. Acts 1939, ch. 205, §§ 2, 3; C. Supp. 1950, § 2715.16 (Williams, § 2715.21); Acts 1957, ch. 209, § 2; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 59-709, 55-7-109, 55-7-351; Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 113; 2000, ch. 700, § 12.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1991–2026 · leading case: State v. Hicks, 55 S.W.3d 515 (Tenn. 2001).
State v. Hicks, 55 S.W.3d 515 (Tenn. 2001). “Tennessee Code Annotated section 55-50-351(a) provides that [I]t is unlawful for any law enforcement officer of this state, except a state patrol officer or officer of the department, to demand the exhibition of such [drivers'] licenses, unless the operator of the motor vehicle…”
State v. Levitt, 73 S.W.3d 159 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2001). “The evidence presented at trial was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the Appellant was operating a motor vehicle in violation of T.C.A. § 55-50-351, requiring that an individual carry a valid drivers [sic] license and display same when asked to by law…”
Bankston v. State, 815 S.W.2d 213 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1991). “§ 55-50-504); carrying and exhibiting license (T.C.A. § 55-50-351); fraudulent use or display of license (T.”
State v. Downey, 945 S.W.2d 102 (Tenn. 1997). “§ 4-7-104 and § 55-50-351. [4] The Court of Criminal Appeals has upheld sobriety roadblocks in the following cases: State v.”
State v. Jackson, 313 S.W.3d 270 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2008). “The state argued at the evidentiary hearing that the officer was statutorily authorized to take the defendant into custody for driving without a license pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 55-50-351. The defendant argued that the offenses of driving without a license…”
State v. McCulloch, 906 S.W.2d 3 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995). “§ 55-50-804 provides that “[t]he licensee shall have the licensee’s license in immediate possession at all times when driving a motor vehicle and shall display it upon demand of any officer or agent of the department or any police officer of the state, county or munici-pality_”…”
United States v. Williams, 170 F. App'x 399 (6th Cir. 2006). “There is no bright-line test for determining when an investigatory stop crosses the line and 3 Officer Gonzalez testified that Williams was arrested for driving without a license in violation of Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-50-351 , which is a misdemeanor offense under Tennessee law.”
State v. Morelock, 851 S.W.2d 838 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1992). “…we affirm the judgment of the trial court and dismiss the indictment. BYERS, P.J., and JONES, J., concur. 1 . T.C.A. § 55-50-351(a).”
State of Tennessee v. Lawrence Ralph, Sr. (Tenn. Crim. App. 2005). “It is Defendant’s contention that he complied with the provisions of Tennessee Code Annotated section 55-50-351(a), regarding the display of a driver’s license, and that his subsequent arrest was, therefore, unlawful.”
Tulis v. Bennett (E.D. Tenn. 2025). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-50-351 (a). Refusing to produce a driver’s license when requested by law enforcement is also a Class C misdemeanor.”
State of Tennessee v. Steven O. Hughes-Mabry (Tenn. Crim. App. 2013). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-50-351 (a) (emphasis added).”
State v. Waller (Tenn. Crim. App. 2010). “T.C.A. § 55-50-351. Failure to have possession of an operator's license is a Class C misdemeanor, and any law enforcement officer is empowered to arrest any person found violating this statute.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-50-351(a) — 6 cases
State v. Hicks, 55 S.W.3d 515 (Tenn. 2001). “Tennessee Code Annotated section 55-50-351(a) provides that [I]t is unlawful for any law enforcement officer of this state, except a state patrol officer or officer of the department, to demand the exhibition of such [drivers'] licenses, unless the operator of the motor vehicle…”
State v. Jackson, 313 S.W.3d 270 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2008). “The state argued at the evidentiary hearing that the officer was statutorily authorized to take the defendant into custody for driving without a license pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 55-50-351. The defendant argued that the offenses of driving without a license…”
State v. Morelock, 851 S.W.2d 838 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1992). “…we affirm the judgment of the trial court and dismiss the indictment. BYERS, P.J., and JONES, J., concur. 1 . T.C.A. § 55-50-351(a).”
State of Tennessee v. Lawrence Ralph, Sr. (Tenn. Crim. App. 2005). “It is Defendant’s contention that he complied with the provisions of Tennessee Code Annotated section 55-50-351(a), regarding the display of a driver’s license, and that his subsequent arrest was, therefore, unlawful.”
State of Tennessee v. Steven O. Hughes-Mabry (Tenn. Crim. App. 2013). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-50-351 (a) (emphasis added).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-50-351(b) — 1 case
Tulis v. Bennett (E.D. Tenn. 2025). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-50-351 (a). Refusing to produce a driver’s license when requested by law enforcement is also a Class C misdemeanor.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.