Tennessee Code Annotated
Tenn. Code Ann. § 57-5-108 (2026)
Revocation or suspension of permits or licenses - Civil penalty - Review of orders - Pilot project concerning local and municipal beer boards
✓ current as of May 2026
- (a)
- (1)
- (A) Permits or licenses issued under this chapter by any county legislative body or any committee or board created by any county legislative body may be revoked or suspended in accordance with this section by the county legislative body, committee or board which issued the permit or license.
- (B) Permits or licenses issued under this chapter by any board or commission created by the metropolitan council of any Class B county may be revoked or suspended in accordance with this section by such board or commission.
- (C) Permits or licenses issued under this chapter by the governmental body of any incorporated city, or by any committee or board created by such governmental body may be revoked or suspended in accordance with this section by the governmental body, committee or board which issued the permit or license.
- (2)
- (A) A city, Class A county, or Class B county, or any committee, board, or commission created by these governmental bodies, shall not, pursuant to § 57-5-608, revoke or suspend the permit of a responsible vendor for a clerk's illegal sale of beer to a minor, if the permit or license holder and the clerk making the sale have complied with the requirements of § 57-5-606 as a responsible vendor under this part, but may impose on the responsible vendor a civil penalty not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000) for each offense of making or permitting to be made any sales to minors or for any other offense.
- (B) The prohibition of subdivision (a)(2)(A) concerning the revocation or suspension of the vendor's permit shall not apply to any vendor who is not a responsible vendor under this part, or to a participating vendor, if the vendor or clerk making a sale to a minor fails to comply with the requirements of § 57-5-606. With respect to such permit or license holder, the committee, board, or commission may, at the time it imposes a revocation or suspension, offer the permit or license holder the alternative of paying a civil penalty not to exceed two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) for each offense of making or permitting to be made any sales to minors, or a civil penalty not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000) for any other offense.
- (C) Permanent revocation of beer permits may only be applied when the permit holder has at least two (2) violations within a twelve-month period.
- (D) Revocation of beer permits applies only to that permit holder, or agents of the permit holder, at that location. Revocation of beer permits shall not stay with the property if the property changes hands, nor may a city, Class A county or Class B county, or any committee, board or commission created by these governmental bodies, apply penalties, suspensions or revocations to other beer permits held by the permittee at other locations.
- (E) Revocation of a beer permit at one (1) location should not be the sole disqualifying factor when considering the issuance of beer permits at other locations.
- (F) If, at any location that has been affected by permanent beer permit revocation, the property changes hands and no longer belongs to the permit holder, or agents of the permit holder, the new property owner may apply to the beer board for release of revocation.
- (G) If a civil penalty is offered as an alternative to revocation or suspension, where allowed under subdivision (a)(2)(B), the holder shall have seven (7) days within which to pay the civil penalty before the revocation or suspension shall be imposed. If the civil penalty is paid within that time, the revocation or suspension shall be deemed withdrawn. The holder's payment of a civil penalty shall not affect the holder's ability to seek review of the civil penalty pursuant to subsection (d).
- (3) A city or county may at any time accept the payment of a civil penalty, not to exceed the amounts set forth in subdivision (a)(2)(B), by a permit or license holder charged with a violation of this chapter, which payment shall be an admission by the holder of the violation so charged and shall be paid to the exclusion of any other penalty that the city or county may impose.
- (1)
- (b) No permit or license shall be revoked on the grounds the operator or any person working for the operator sells beer to a minor over eighteen (18) years of age if such minor exhibits an identification, false or otherwise, indicating the minor's age to be twenty-one (21) or over, if the minor's appearance as to maturity is such that the minor might reasonably be presumed to be of such age and is unknown to such person making the sale. The license or permit may be suspended for a period not to exceed ten (10) days or a civil penalty up to one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) may be imposed pursuant to subdivision (a)(3). However, this shall not be construed in any way to relieve the minor from liability for making such illegal purchase as provided in § 57-5-301.
- (c) The local legislative body or a committee or board created by the local legislative body, in considering the suspension or revocation of a license, shall consider repeated violations of any local ordinance or state law involving prohibited sexual contact on the premises of an adult-oriented establishment.
- (d) The action of such agency in connection with the issuance of any order of any kind, including the revocation or suspension of a license or permit, imposition of a civil penalty or the refusal to grant a license or permit under §§ 57-5-105, 57-5-106 and this section, may be reviewed by statutory writ of certiorari, with a trial de novo as a substitute for an appeal, the petition of certiorari to be addressed to the circuit or chancery court of the county in which any such order was issued.
- (e) Immediately upon the grant of the writ of certiorari, the agency revoking or suspending a license or permit or imposing a civil penalty shall cause to be made, certified and forwarded to the court a complete transcript of the proceedings in the cause.
- (f) This section shall be the sole remedy and exclusive method of review of any action or order that may have been issued by any county legislative body, or any committee appointed by any county legislative body, or from any board or commission authorized under §§ 57-5-105 and 57-5-106, including the refusal or failure to grant any license or permit or the imposition of a civil penalty. The Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure shall be applicable in connection with such review. Any party dissatisfied with the decree of the court may, upon giving bond as required in other cases, appeal, where the cause shall be heard upon the transcript of the records from the circuit court.
- (g) A judge of any court of record shall have the authority to supersede, stay or enjoin any order of an agency revoking, suspending or imposing a civil penalty made under the authority of this chapter for good cause shown on part of the petitioning party thereof. No circuit or chancery judge shall have the authority to grant any such extraordinary writ except the judge of a court of record to which the petition for certiorari is addressed.
- (h) If a final judgment is entered by the trial court superseding the revocation or suspension order or order imposing a civil penalty, and the cause is appealed by the agency, the final judgment of the trial court shall remain in force until final appellate disposition of the cause.
- (i) In instances involving only wholesale beer permits or licenses, or certificates of registration, the order of the agency suspending, revoking or failing to renew such wholesale beer permits or licenses or certificates of registration or imposing civil penalties shall as a matter of law be stayed or superseded, and the order will not be effective until final judicial review, including all available appeals, of the matter. In instances where no appeal is taken or perfected by the wholesaler within the required time as prescribed by law, the order of the agency shall become effective.
- (j) The remedy provided by this section shall be the only method of reviewing orders of county legislative bodies, governing bodies or municipal corporations, boards or committees revoking or suspending licenses issued under this chapter or imposing civil penalties.
- (k) Where a permit or license is revoked, no new license or permit shall be issued to permit the sale of beer on the same premises until after the expiration of one (1) year from the date the revocation becomes final and effective. The board, in its discretion, may determine that issuance of a license or permit before the expiration of one (1) year from the date of revocation becomes final is appropriate, if the individual applying for such issuance is not the original holder of the license or any family member who could inherit from such individual under the statute of intestate succession.
- (l) Powers to suspend, revoke, or impose civil penalties conferred in this section upon county legislative bodies and governmental bodies of incorporated cities and any committees, commissions, or boards created by such bodies and/or governmental bodies are likewise conferred upon the commissioner of revenue as they may relate to certificates of registration and transportation permits issued by the commissioner under this chapter to any licensed brewer, wholesaler or distributor for the failure of any such person to file with the commissioner any report required by this chapter, or for the filing of a false report, or the failure to pay tax due by any such licensee under this chapter and rules and regulations promulgated pursuant thereto, or for the receipt, possession, storage or transportation of beer in violation of this chapter, or any rule and regulation promulgated by the commissioner thereunder, and for no other reason. The remedy provided by this section shall likewise be the only method of reviewing orders of the commissioner revoking or suspending certificates of registration and transportation permits issued under this chapter or imposing civil penalties.
- (m) Any county, municipal or metropolitan beer board or committee may, at its discretion, revoke or suspend the permit of or impose a civil penalty pursuant to subdivision (a)(3) on any beer retailer within its jurisdiction who is found to possess beer on which the state beer barrelage tax, imposed by § 57-5-201, and the city and county wholesale beer tax, imposed by § 57-6-103, has not been paid. The burden of proof shall be upon the retail beer permit holder to show that the two (2) taxes on the beer in the permit holder's possession have been paid by showing that the beer was purchased from a Tennessee beer wholesaler, which fact shall be shown by the retailer providing a bill of sale or invoice for the beer which shall include the name and address of the wholesaler, the name and address of the retailer, the number of containers of each brand of beer purchased by the retailer, and which shall be signed by the retailer.
- (n)
- (1) A local legislative body or a committee or board created by the local legislative body shall not impose a fine or other penalty on a permittee based solely on a report issued by another agency of the local government, other than a law enforcement agency, as a predicate to enter the premises of a permittee or cite the permittee.
- (2) Except as provided in subdivision (n)(1), the local legislative body or a committee or board created by the local legislative body may only issue a citation to a permittee for a violation of this chapter after its own independent investigation.
- (o) [Deleted by 2024 amendment.]
- (p) [Deleted by 2024 amendment.]
Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 670,s 2, eff. 4/11/2024.
Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 670,s 1, eff. 4/11/2024.
Acts 1943, ch. 53, § 3; C. Supp. 1950, § 1191.14; Acts 1961, ch. 105, § 2; 1965, ch. 123, § 1; 1965, ch. 321, § 4; 1969, ch. 56, § 1; 1969, ch. 299, § 1; 1971, ch. 21, § 1; 1973, ch. 68, § 7; 1977, ch. 454, § 1; impl. am. Acts 1978, ch. 934, §§ 7, 36; impl. am. Acts 1979, ch. 413, §§ 3, 4; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 57-209; Acts 1981, ch. 377, §§ 2-9; 1981, ch. 449, § 2; 1984, ch. 1006, § 7; 1985, ch. 315, § 2; 1989, ch. 147, § 6; 1989, ch. 583, §§ 1-4; 1990, ch. 889, § 1; 1993, ch. 297, § 8; 1993, ch. 349, § 1; T.C.A., § 57-5-109; Acts 1996, ch. 641, § 1; 2006, ch. 864, § 11; 2012 , ch. 742, § 1; 2012 , ch. 881, § 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 27
cases, 1982–2017 · leading case: Dave Brundage v. Cumberland Cnty., 357 S.W.3d 361 (Tenn. 2011).
Dave Brundage v. Cumberland Cnty., 357 S.W.3d 361 (Tenn. 2011). “1987)); Tenn.Code Ann. § 57-5-108(d) (Supp.2011) (revocation or suspension of a permit to sell beer); Tenn.”
Watkins v. Naifeh, 635 S.W.2d 104 (Tenn. 1982). “The regulation by cities of beer sales is governed by TCA § 57-5-108, which provides in pertinent part: All incorporated cities and towns in the state of Tennessee are authorized to pass proper ordinances governing the issuance and revocation of licenses for the storage, sale,…”
Lions Head Homeowners' Ass'n v. Metro. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 968 S.W.2d 296 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). “For the purpose of the zoning ordinances, "Floor area ratio” means “the total floor area on a zone lot, divided by the lot area of that zone lot.”
Sigler v. Metro. Beer Permit Bd. of Metro. Gov't of Nashville, 62 S.W.3d 732 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “In a case involving a beer permit, the Board’s decision may be appealed to circuit or chancery court per section 57-5-108 of the Tennessee Code. On appeal to circuit or chancery court, additional proof may be presented, and the statute provides for a trial de novo, which, in…”
Boyd's Creek Enter., LLC. v. Sevier Cnty., Tennessee, a Governmental Corp. Entity, 362 S.W.3d 600 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). “Standard of Review The exclusive method of review for a beer board’s denial of a beer permit is the statutory writ of certiorari set forth in Tennessee Code Annotated section 57-5-108. Tenn.Code Ann. § 57 — 5—108(d), (f) *604 (Supp.”
Pantry, Inc. v. City of Pigeon Forge, 681 S.W.2d 23 (Tenn. 1984). “of enclosed, heated floor space is a valid enactment authorized by T.C.A., § 57-5-108, which provides: “(a)(1) All incorporated cities and towns in the state of Tennessee are authorized to pass proper ordinances governing the issuance and revocation of licenses for the storage,…”
Grigsby v. City of Plainview, 194 S.W.3d 408 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “— Anyone who may be aggrieved by any final order or judgment of any board or commission functioning under the laws of this state may have the order or judgment reviewed by the courts, where not otherwise specifically provided, in the manner provided by this chapter.”
Fritts v. Wallace, 723 S.W.2d 948 (Tenn. 1987). “Under T.C.A. § 57-5-108(a)(l), [a]ll incorporated cities and towns in the State of Tennessee are authorized to pass proper ordinances governing the issuance and revocation or suspension of licenses for the storage, sale, manufacture, and/or distribution of such beer and/or other…”
State ex rel. Amvets Post 27 v. Beer Bd. of Jellico, 717 S.W.2d 878 (Tenn. 1986). “Of course, it has been long held in this state that, consistently with T.C.A. § 57-5-108, municipalities have extensive authority to regulate the sale of beer within their boundaries.”
Suleiman v. City of Memphis Alcohol Comm'n, 290 S.W.3d 844 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). “Tennessee Code Annotated section 57-5-108 provides that the exclusive method of review of an agency’s refusal to grant this type of license is by way of the statutory writ of certiorari.”
Beer Bd. for Goodlettsville v. Brass A Saloon of Rivergate, Inc., 710 S.W.2d 33 (Tenn. 1986). “T.C.A. § 57-5-108(a)(1) authorizes all incorporated cities and towns in the State of Tennessee to pass ordinances governing the issuance and revocation of licenses for the storage, sale, manufacture, and distribution of beer to promote public health, morals, and safety.”
Montgomery Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Kali Orexi, LLC, 303 S.W.3d 281 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 57-5-108(c) (Supp.2008).”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 57-5-108(a)(1): 2 cases
Beer Bd. for Goodlettsville v. Brass A Saloon of Rivergate, Inc., 710 S.W.2d 33 (Tenn. 1986). “T.C.A. § 57-5-108(a)(1) authorizes all incorporated cities and towns in the State of Tennessee to pass ordinances governing the issuance and revocation of licenses for the storage, sale, manufacture, and distribution of beer to promote public health, morals, and safety.”
Claiborne Country Club, Inc. v. City of Tazewell, 872 S.W.2d 685 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1993).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 57-5-108(a)(l): 3 cases
Fritts v. Wallace, 723 S.W.2d 948 (Tenn. 1987). “Under T.C.A. § 57-5-108(a)(l), [a]ll incorporated cities and towns in the State of Tennessee are authorized to pass proper ordinances governing the issuance and revocation or suspension of licenses for the storage, sale, manufacture, and/or distribution of such beer and/or other…”
Pantry, Inc. v. City of Pigeon Forge, 681 S.W.2d 23 (Tenn. 1984). “of enclosed, heated floor space is a valid enactment authorized by T.C.A., § 57-5-108, which provides: “(a)(1) All incorporated cities and towns in the state of Tennessee are authorized to pass proper ordinances governing the issuance and revocation of licenses for the storage,…”
State ex rel. Amvets Post 27 v. Beer Bd. of Jellico, 717 S.W.2d 878 (Tenn. 1986). “Of course, it has been long held in this state that, consistently with T.C.A. § 57-5-108, municipalities have extensive authority to regulate the sale of beer within their boundaries.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 57-5-108(b): 1 case
Sigler v. Metro. Beer Permit Bd. of Metro. Gov't of Nashville, 62 S.W.3d 732 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “In a case involving a beer permit, the Board’s decision may be appealed to circuit or chancery court per section 57-5-108 of the Tennessee Code. On appeal to circuit or chancery court, additional proof may be presented, and the statute provides for a trial de novo, which, in…”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 57-5-108(b)(l): 1 case
PP & C, Inc. v. Metro. Beer Permit Bd., 833 S.W.2d 90 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 57-5-108(c): 1 case
Montgomery Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Kali Orexi, LLC, 303 S.W.3d 281 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 57-5-108(c) (Supp.2008).”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 57-5-108(d): 6 cases
Dave Brundage v. Cumberland Cnty., 357 S.W.3d 361 (Tenn. 2011). “1987)); Tenn.Code Ann. § 57-5-108(d) (Supp.2011) (revocation or suspension of a permit to sell beer); Tenn.”
Boyd's Creek Enter., LLC. v. Sevier Cnty., Tennessee, a Governmental Corp. Entity, 362 S.W.3d 600 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). “Standard of Review The exclusive method of review for a beer board’s denial of a beer permit is the statutory writ of certiorari set forth in Tennessee Code Annotated section 57-5-108. Tenn.Code Ann. § 57 — 5—108(d), (f) *604 (Supp.”
Suleiman v. City of Memphis Alcohol Comm'n, 290 S.W.3d 844 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). “Tennessee Code Annotated section 57-5-108 provides that the exclusive method of review of an agency’s refusal to grant this type of license is by way of the statutory writ of certiorari.”
Lynn v. Blue (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998).
Entertainer 118 & Meroney Ent., Inc. dba Ken's Gold Club v. Metro. Sexually Oriented Bus. Licensing Bd. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 57-5-108(e): 4 cases
Lions Head Homeowners' Ass'n v. Metro. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 968 S.W.2d 296 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). “For the purpose of the zoning ordinances, "Floor area ratio” means “the total floor area on a zone lot, divided by the lot area of that zone lot.”
Boyd's Creek Enter., LLC. v. Sevier Cnty., Tennessee, a Governmental Corp. Entity, 362 S.W.3d 600 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). “Standard of Review The exclusive method of review for a beer board’s denial of a beer permit is the statutory writ of certiorari set forth in Tennessee Code Annotated section 57-5-108. Tenn.Code Ann. § 57 — 5—108(d), (f) *604 (Supp.”
Suleiman v. City of Memphis Alcohol Comm'n, 290 S.W.3d 844 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). “Tennessee Code Annotated section 57-5-108 provides that the exclusive method of review of an agency’s refusal to grant this type of license is by way of the statutory writ of certiorari.”
Ahmad Suleiman d/b/a Barksdale Mkt. v. City Of Memphis Alcohol Comm'n (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.