Tennessee Code Annotated
Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-1-117 (2026)
Conditions for making medical records available for inspection and copying - Statutorily privileged records - Immunity from liability - Compelling production of medical records - Disciplinary action - Confidentiality - Record accessibility
✓ current as of May 2026
- (a) Notwithstanding §§ 63-2-101(b), 68-11-1502 and 68-11-1503, and regardless of any express or implied contracts, agreements or covenants of confidentiality based upon those sections, health care providers shall make their medical records available for inspection and copying by the department of health or its representatives, designees or employees based on the following conditions:
- (1) Upon the presentation of a written authorization for release signed by the patient or the patient's legal representative; or
- (2) Upon a written request made by the department of health investigators, inspectors or surveyors who are performing authorized investigations, inspections or surveys of facilities or individuals licensed pursuant to this title or title 68 based on a complaint filed with the department or an inspection or survey required by state or federal law. The written request shall contain the nature of the violation, the applicable laws and rules that may have been violated and the specific date by which production of the records is required. The written request shall be made in good faith and shall be related to the complaint, inspection or survey.
- (b) This section shall not apply to records that are made statutorily privileged, which shall require for their production a release that specifically identifies the privilege, contains a statement that the privilege is waived and that is signed by the patient or the patient's legal representative.
- (c) Any health care provider or representative of any health care provider who furnishes records to a duly authorized representative, designee or employee of the department of health shall be immune from liability to any patient, individual or organization for furnishing such information, data, reports or records or for damages resulting from any decision, opinion, action and proceedings rendered, entered or acted upon by the department of health, if the information or other records or documents provided were provided or created in good faith and without malice and on the basis of facts reasonably known or reasonably believed to exist.
- (d) In the event that a health care provider does not comply with the written request for medical records issued in compliance with subdivision (a)(2), the state may file a petition in the chancery court of Davidson County to compel production of the medical records within fifteen (15) days following the date specified for the production of the medical records contained in the written request.
- (e) A health care provider's willful disregard of the request for medical records pursuant to this section is grounds for disciplinary action by the licensing board that regulates the health care provider.
- (f) The following materials, documents, and other matters related to, or compiled or created pursuant to, an investigation conducted by or on behalf of the department are confidential and not a public record or subject to subpoena, except for subpoenas from law enforcement agencies, before formal disciplinary charges are filed against the provider:
- (1) Allegations against the health care provider;
- (2) Complainant's identifying information;
- (3) Identifying information of a witness who requests anonymity;
- (4) Patient's identifying information;
- (5) Patient's medical record; and
- (6) Any report or documents prepared by or on behalf of the department as a part of an investigation.
- (g) After the filing of formal disciplinary charges against the provider, only the materials and documents upon which the charges are based may be disclosed as a public record, but not the complainant's identifying information, identifying information of a witness who requests anonymity, patient's identifying information, patient's medical record or investigator's report.
- (h) Department annual health care facility and pharmacy survey inspection reports shall be available to the public pursuant to subsections (f) and (g).
- (i) Pursuant to § 68-1-104, the commissioner or the commissioner's designee, upon request, shall obtain access to records maintained by any facility, entity, or individual licensed under this title. Access shall be given in the most efficient and expedient means possible, including remote electronic access, to facilitate investigations and inquiries while responding to an immediate threat to the public health, welfare, or general good. Electronic access shall be limited to the minimum necessary for the duration of the outbreak, event, or time in which the public health is under immediate threat as determined by the commissioner.
- (j) This section does not modify or limit the prehearing discovery provisions set forth in the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act, compiled in title 4, chapter 5.
- (k) As used in this section:
- (1) "Health care provider" means health care professionals, establishments or facilities licensed, registered, certified or permitted pursuant to this title or title 68 and regulated either under the authority of the department of health or any agency, board, council or committee attached to the department; and
- (2) "Medical record" means any and all documents maintained by a health care provider relating to a patient's diagnosis, care and treatment, including, but not limited to, notes, reports, memos, emails, facsimile transmissions, laboratory tests, billing documents and medication orders.
- (l) The commissioner of health is authorized to promulgate rules and regulations to effectuate this part.
Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 447, s 1, eff. 5/22/2019.
Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 240, s 3, eff. 5/2/2017.
Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 154, s 1, eff. 4/17/2015.
Amended by 2014 Tenn. Acts, ch. 949,s 2, eff. 7/1/2014.
Acts 1985, ch. 120, § 1; T.C.A., § 63-1-130; Acts 2003 , ch. 281, § 1; 2004, ch. 575, §§ 1 - 3; 2005, ch. 118, §§ 1, 2; 2009 , ch. 188, § 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 2007–2015 · leading case: McNiel v. Cooper, 241 S.W.3d 886 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007).
McNiel v. Cooper, 241 S.W.3d 886 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “After the Board requested access to his patients’ records in accordance with Tenn.Code Ann. § 63-1-117 (2004), the physician filed a declaratory judgment action in the Chancery Court for Davidson County challenging the constitutionality of the statute.”
Frank H. McNiel v. Susan R. Cooper (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “After the Board requested access to his patients’ records in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-1-117 (2004), the physician filed a declaratory judgment action in the Chancery Court for Davidson County challenging the constitutionality of the statute.”
Joseph Edward Rich, M.D. v. Tennessee Bd. of Med. Examiners (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). “Rich brought pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-1-117 (a)(3)(A). We find no merit to Dr.”
State v. John Cote & Sarah Cote, In Re: Dr. Sandra Elkins (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). “” The motion referred to Tennessee Code Annotated section 63-1-117, which provides: (b)(1) Allegations against a practitioner of the healing arts and the various branches thereof, compiled pursuant to an investigation conducted by the division, are public information upon the…”
Althea Dean-Hayslett, as Surviving Widow of Jerry Hayslett v. Methodist Healthcare (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015). “…by providers other than those identified on the protective order is not permissible. See Tennessee Code Annotated § 63-1-117 (2010), § 63-2-101 (2010), § 68-11- 312, § 68-11-1501, § 68-11-1502 (2013), § 68-11-1503 (2013), § 68-11-1504 (2010). By its express terms…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-1-117(a) — 1 case
McNiel v. Cooper, 241 S.W.3d 886 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “After the Board requested access to his patients’ records in accordance with Tenn.Code Ann. § 63-1-117 (2004), the physician filed a declaratory judgment action in the Chancery Court for Davidson County challenging the constitutionality of the statute.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-1-117(a)(1)(B) — 1 case
McNiel v. Cooper, 241 S.W.3d 886 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “After the Board requested access to his patients’ records in accordance with Tenn.Code Ann. § 63-1-117 (2004), the physician filed a declaratory judgment action in the Chancery Court for Davidson County challenging the constitutionality of the statute.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-1-117(a)(1)(B)(i) — 1 case
McNiel v. Cooper, 241 S.W.3d 886 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “After the Board requested access to his patients’ records in accordance with Tenn.Code Ann. § 63-1-117 (2004), the physician filed a declaratory judgment action in the Chancery Court for Davidson County challenging the constitutionality of the statute.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-1-117(a)(1)(B)(ii) — 1 case
McNiel v. Cooper, 241 S.W.3d 886 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “After the Board requested access to his patients’ records in accordance with Tenn.Code Ann. § 63-1-117 (2004), the physician filed a declaratory judgment action in the Chancery Court for Davidson County challenging the constitutionality of the statute.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-1-117(a)(1)(B)(iii) — 1 case
McNiel v. Cooper, 241 S.W.3d 886 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “After the Board requested access to his patients’ records in accordance with Tenn.Code Ann. § 63-1-117 (2004), the physician filed a declaratory judgment action in the Chancery Court for Davidson County challenging the constitutionality of the statute.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-1-117(a)(1)(B)(ü) — 1 case
McNiel v. Cooper, 241 S.W.3d 886 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “After the Board requested access to his patients’ records in accordance with Tenn.Code Ann. § 63-1-117 (2004), the physician filed a declaratory judgment action in the Chancery Court for Davidson County challenging the constitutionality of the statute.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-1-117(a)(3) — 2 cases
McNiel v. Cooper, 241 S.W.3d 886 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “After the Board requested access to his patients’ records in accordance with Tenn.Code Ann. § 63-1-117 (2004), the physician filed a declaratory judgment action in the Chancery Court for Davidson County challenging the constitutionality of the statute.”
Frank H. McNiel v. Susan R. Cooper (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “After the Board requested access to his patients’ records in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-1-117 (2004), the physician filed a declaratory judgment action in the Chancery Court for Davidson County challenging the constitutionality of the statute.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-1-117(a)(3)(B) — 1 case
McNiel v. Cooper, 241 S.W.3d 886 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “After the Board requested access to his patients’ records in accordance with Tenn.Code Ann. § 63-1-117 (2004), the physician filed a declaratory judgment action in the Chancery Court for Davidson County challenging the constitutionality of the statute.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-1-117(b)(2) — 1 case
McNiel v. Cooper, 241 S.W.3d 886 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “After the Board requested access to his patients’ records in accordance with Tenn.Code Ann. § 63-1-117 (2004), the physician filed a declaratory judgment action in the Chancery Court for Davidson County challenging the constitutionality of the statute.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.