Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-19-106 (2026)

Authorized services - Practice protocols for non-endorsed physician assistants - Endorsed physician assistants - Collaboration agreement requirements - Standard of care - Promulgation of rules

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1042,s 2, eff. upon promulgation of rules governing the collaborative agreements of physician assistants with physicians; see T.C.A. § 63-19-106(h)(1).

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 565, s 6, eff. 5/26/2021.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 610, Secs.s 6, s 7, s 8, s 9, s 10, s 11, s 12, s 13 eff. 7/1/2018.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 610, s 5, eff. 7/1/2018.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 946, s 4, eff. 4/27/2016.

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 189, s 1, eff. 7/1/2015.

Acts 1985, ch. 376, § 1; T.C.A., § 63-19-206; Acts 1994, ch. 722, § 1; 1995, ch. 358, § 2; 1996, ch. 659, § 3; 1998, ch. 842, § 4; 1999, ch. 33, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2009–2019 · leading case: Cox v. MA Primary & Urgent Care Clinic, 313 S.W.3d 240 (Tenn. 2010).
Cox v. MA Primary & Urgent Care Clinic, 313 S.W.3d 240 (Tenn. 2010). · cites it 9× “§ 63-19-105 may provide selected medical/surgical services as outlined in a written protocol according to T.C.A. § 63-19-106, and when such services are within his skills.”
Melissa Michelle Cox v. M. A. Primary (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 14× “Cox contends that Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-19-106 “sets forth a vicarious standard based upon the supervision rendered by the primary care physician.”
Marchelle Buman, of the Est. of Kenneth Jenkins v. Alycia D. Gibson, P.A., Thomas Paul Evans, M.D., Andrew H. Lundberg, M.D., & Paris Surgical Specialists, PLLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 14× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-19-106 (a)(1). Buman contends the first sentence of subsection (1) requires that supervising physicians maintain an “active and continuous overview of the physician assistant’s activities.”
Tennessee Dep't of Health v. Norma J. Sparks (2019). · cites it 6× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-19-106 (a)(1). Beginning in November 2010, Sparks worked as a physician assistant at Beersheba Springs Medical Clinic (“Clinic”).”
Daniels, Cathy v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc., 2015 TN WC 19 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2015). · cites it 2× “Section 63-19-106(a) provides that: "A physician assistant is authorized to perform selected medical services only under the supervision of a licensed physician" (emphasis added).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-19-106(a) — 2 cases
Cox v. MA Primary & Urgent Care Clinic, 313 S.W.3d 240 (Tenn. 2010). “§ 63-19-105 may provide selected medical/surgical services as outlined in a written protocol according to T.C.A. § 63-19-106, and when such services are within his skills.”
Daniels, Cathy v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc., 2015 TN WC 19 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2015). “Section 63-19-106(a) provides that: "A physician assistant is authorized to perform selected medical services only under the supervision of a licensed physician" (emphasis added).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-19-106(a)(3) — 2 cases
Cox v. MA Primary & Urgent Care Clinic, 313 S.W.3d 240 (Tenn. 2010). “§ 63-19-105 may provide selected medical/surgical services as outlined in a written protocol according to T.C.A. § 63-19-106, and when such services are within his skills.”
Marchelle Buman, of the Est. of Kenneth Jenkins v. Alycia D. Gibson, P.A., Thomas Paul Evans, M.D., Andrew H. Lundberg, M.D., & Paris Surgical Specialists, PLLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-19-106 (a)(1). Buman contends the first sentence of subsection (1) requires that supervising physicians maintain an “active and continuous overview of the physician assistant’s activities.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-19-106(b) — 2 cases
Cox v. MA Primary & Urgent Care Clinic, 313 S.W.3d 240 (Tenn. 2010). “§ 63-19-105 may provide selected medical/surgical services as outlined in a written protocol according to T.C.A. § 63-19-106, and when such services are within his skills.”
Melissa Michelle Cox v. M. A. Primary (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). “Cox contends that Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-19-106 “sets forth a vicarious standard based upon the supervision rendered by the primary care physician.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.