Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-5-124 (2024)

Grounds for denial, suspension or revocation of licenses - Examinations - Investigations of reports - Civil penalties - Costs - Oaths and subpoenas

✓ Justia copy: laws through about 2024 (2025 and 2026 sessions missing)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 745, s 25, eff. 7/1/2018.

Acts 1957, ch. 32, § 26; 1963, ch. 107, § 3; 1969, ch. 29, § 10; 1978, ch. 824, § 18; 1981, ch. 99, § 13; T.C.A., § 63-554; Acts 1984, ch. 608, § 4; 1985, ch. 120, § 8; 1986, ch. 501, §§2, 3; 1988, ch. 635, § 18; 1990, ch. 1031, §§ 25, 26; 2000, ch. 927, § 6; 2001, ch. 330, §§ 8, 9; 2002, ch. 771, §12; 2012 , ch. 798, §36; 2012 , ch. 848, §§ 69, 70.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1985–2003 · leading case: Holmes v. Missouri Dental Bd., 703 S.W.2d 11 (Mo. Ct. App. 1985).
Holmes v. Missouri Dental Bd., 703 S.W.2d 11 (Mo. Ct. App. 1985). “Holmes “admits the following violations of T.C.A. 63-5-124: “(1) Unprofessional, dishonorable or unethical conduct.”
Douglas v. State, 921 S.W.2d 180 (Tenn. 1996). · cites it 2× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 63-5-124(a). FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY J.”
Eleonora Kogan. v. Tennessee Bd. of Dentistry, No. M2003-00291-COA-R3-CV, 2003 WL 23093863 (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 30, 2003). · cites it 2× “On August 14, 2001 the division of health related boards of the Department of Health filed charges before the Board of Dentistry against Appellant charging her with unprofessional conduct, making false and misleading statements, and habitual intoxication or personal misuse of…”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-5-124(a): 2 cases
Douglas v. State, 921 S.W.2d 180 (Tenn. 1996). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 63-5-124(a). FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY J.”
Eleonora Kogan. v. Tennessee Bd. of Dentistry, No. M2003-00291-COA-R3-CV, 2003 WL 23093863 (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 30, 2003). “On August 14, 2001 the division of health related boards of the Department of Health filed charges before the Board of Dentistry against Appellant charging her with unprofessional conduct, making false and misleading statements, and habitual intoxication or personal misuse of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.