Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-24-101 (2026)

Writings eligible for registration - Refusal to register documents not in English - Electronic records

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 181, Secs.s1, s2 eff. 7/1/2021.

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 524, s 2, eff. 1/1/2016.

Code 1858, § 2030 (deriv. Acts 1805, ch. 16, § 2; 1805, ch. 72, § 5; 1807, ch. 85, §§ 3, 4; 1831, ch. 90, §§ 1, 8, 11, 13; 1832, ch. 11, § 3; 1833, ch. 92, § 6; 1839-1840, ch. 26, § 1; 1841-1842, ch. 12, § 4; 1843-1844, ch. 187, § 1); Acts 1875, ch. 124, § 1; 1883, ch. 253, § 1; Shan., § 3697; Acts 1919, ch. 128, § 1; 1925, ch. 148, § 1; Shan. Supp., § 3704a8; mod. Code 1932, § 7621; mod. C. Supp. 1950, § 7621; Acts 1981, ch. 405, § 1; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 64-2401; Acts 1984, ch. 603, § 1; 1984, ch. 892, § 1; 1989, ch. 213, § 1; 1989, ch. 364, § 5; 1990, ch. 756, § 2; 1995, ch. 162, § 1; 1999, ch. 364, §§ 1, 2; 2001, ch. 48, § 1; 2002, ch. 735, § 13; 2004, ch. 497, § 1; 2004, ch. 576, § 4; 2005, ch. 13, § 1; 2005, ch. 303, § 1; 2007 , ch. 116, § 1; 2007 , ch. 420, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 53 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1982–2026 · leading case: Walker v. Elam (In Re Fowler), 201 B.R. 771 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1996).
Walker v. Elam (In Re Fowler), 201 B.R. 771 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1996). · cites it 10× “The Defendant argues that the registration laws of Tennessee (Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 66-24-101 (1993 & Supp.”
Grand Valley Lakes Prop. Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. Dennis Burrow, 376 S.W.3d 66 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 6× “Furthermore, it is undisputed that, on April 2, 1998, the amended and restated restrictive covenants and bylaws were filed with the Hardeman County Register’s Office pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated Section 66-24-101. Tennessee Code Annotated Section 66-26-102 provides: “All…”
Lancaster v. Hurst (In Re Hurst), 27 B.R. 740 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1983). · cites it 9× “With the possible exception of the divorce decree describing the interest of the defendant in the disputed property, no writing eligible for registration under Tenn.Code Ann. § 66-24-101 (1982) has ever been executed.”
Mostoller v. Kelley (In Re Kelley), 304 B.R. 331 (E.D. Tenn. 2003). · cites it 5× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-24-101 (1993 & Supp.”
Robby's Pancake House of Florida, Inc. v. Walker (In Re Robby's Pancake House of Florida, Inc.), 24 B.R. 989 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1982). · cites it 6× “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 66-24-101 (1982) and Tenn.”
Norwood v. Crabtree (In Re Crabtree), 39 B.R. 713 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1984). · cites it 13× “§ 55-3-125 (1980); Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 66-24-101, 66-24-104 (1980); Tenn.”
Mills v. Brown (In Re Brown), 182 B.R. 778 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1995). · cites it 5× “In 1989, Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-24-101 was amended to provide for the registration of “[a]U trust agreements or a summary or abstract of such agreements.”
In Re Crim, 81 S.W.3d 764 (Tenn. 2002). · cites it 2× “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 66-24-101(8). To be eligible for registration, a deed of trust must satisfy one of two alternative methods for authentication under Tenn.”
Greene v. Ellis (In Re Ellis), 152 B.R. 211 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1993). · cites it 4× “Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 66-24-101(a)(4) and 66-26-103 (1982).”
In Re Bushee, 319 B.R. 542 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2004). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-24-101 (a)(8) (2004).”
Holiday Hosp. Franchising, Inc. v. States Resources, Inc., 232 S.W.3d 41 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “Tennessee Code Annotated Section 66-26-101 provides, in pertinent part, that “[a]ll of the instruments [that may be registered as provided by] § 66-24-101 shall have effect between the parties to the same, and their heirs and representatives, without registration; but as to…”
Newton v. Herskowitz (In Re Gatlinburg Motel Enter., Ltd.), 119 B.R. 955 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1990). · cites it 3× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 66-24-101 (Supp.1990) provides in material part: Writings eligible for registration.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-24-101(1) — 1 case
Norwood v. Crabtree (In Re Crabtree), 39 B.R. 713 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1984). “§ 55-3-125 (1980); Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 66-24-101, 66-24-104 (1980); Tenn.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-24-101(12) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-24-101(4) — 2 cases
Walker v. Elam (In Re Fowler), 201 B.R. 771 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1996). “The Defendant argues that the registration laws of Tennessee (Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 66-24-101 (1993 & Supp.”
Lancaster v. Key, 24 B.R. 897 (E.D. Tenn. 1982).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-24-101(7) — 1 case
Norwood v. Crabtree (In Re Crabtree), 39 B.R. 713 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1984). “§ 55-3-125 (1980); Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 66-24-101, 66-24-104 (1980); Tenn.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-24-101(8) — 3 cases
In Re Crim, 81 S.W.3d 764 (Tenn. 2002). “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 66-24-101(8). To be eligible for registration, a deed of trust must satisfy one of two alternative methods for authentication under Tenn.”
Walker v. Elam (In Re Fowler), 201 B.R. 771 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1996). “The Defendant argues that the registration laws of Tennessee (Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 66-24-101 (1993 & Supp.”
Eva M. Lemeh, Tr. v. Emc Mortg. Corp., 81 S.W.3d 764 (Tenn. 2002).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-24-101(a) — 1 case
Lancaster v. Hurst (In Re Hurst), 27 B.R. 740 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1983). “With the possible exception of the divorce decree describing the interest of the defendant in the disputed property, no writing eligible for registration under Tenn.Code Ann. § 66-24-101 (1982) has ever been executed.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-24-101(a)(1) — 1 case
Bank of Am. v. Greene, 465 B.R. 789 (E.D. Tenn. 2012).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-24-101(a)(15) — 1 case
First Tennessee Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Trotter (In re Trotter), 266 B.R. 817 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2001).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-24-101(a)(27) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-24-101(a)(4) — 1 case
Greene v. Ellis (In Re Ellis), 152 B.R. 211 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1993). “Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 66-24-101(a)(4) and 66-26-103 (1982).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-24-101(a)(8) — 3 cases
Walker v. Elam (In Re Fowler), 201 B.R. 771 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1996). “The Defendant argues that the registration laws of Tennessee (Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 66-24-101 (1993 & Supp.”
Bank of Am. v. Greene, 465 B.R. 789 (E.D. Tenn. 2012).
Vinings Bank v. Homeland Cmty. Bank (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-24-101(a)(l) — 1 case
In re Don Williams Constr. Co., 143 B.R. 865 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1992).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-24-101(e) — 3 cases
HHP-Brentwood, L.L.C. v. Aurora Loan Servs., LLC (In re Surti), 434 B.R. 515 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 2010).
Mostoller v. Equity One, Inc. (In Re Hickman), 367 B.R. 620 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2007).
In Re Surti, 434 B.R. 515 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 2010).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.