Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 8-8-303 (2026)

Waiver of governmental immunity - Special deputies

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 260, s 2, eff. 4/30/2019.

Acts 1972, ch. 800, § 3; 1976, ch. 775, § 1; T.C.A., § 8-834.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1985–2023 · leading case: Jenkins v. Loudon Cnty., 736 S.W.2d 603 (Tenn. 1987).
Jenkins v. Loudon Cnty., 736 S.W.2d 603 (Tenn. 1987). · cites it 4× “' "The ensuing section [T.C.A. § 8-8-303] waives the immunity of the county as to such suits but only to the extent of the amount of the sheriff's surety bond.”
Hensley v. Fowler, 920 S.W.2d 649 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 6× “Harbin was not a special deputy at all since T.C.A. § 8-8-303 set out above prohibits service in that capacity without the appropriate bond.”
Willis v. Barksdale, 625 F. Supp. 411 (W.D. Tenn. 1985). · cites it 2× “Section 8-8-303(a) provides: The governmental immunity of the county in which the said sheriff serves is waived for purposes of Section 8-8-302, but to an extent not in excess of the surety bond executed for that county’s sheriff pursuant to Section 8-8-103.”
Lester Eugene Siler v. Charles Scott (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 10× “Maximum Liability of County under Tenn. Code Ann. § 8-8-303 Campbell County filed a pre-trial motion for partial summary judgment asking the trial court to determine its maximum potential liability under Tenn.”
Jenkins v. Loudon Cnty., 736 S.W.2d 599 (Tenn. 1987). · cites it 4× “’ “The ensuing section [T.C.A. § 8-8-303] waives the immunity of the county as to such suits but only to the extent of the amount of the sheriff’s surety bond.”
Cordell v. Hamilton Cnty. Tennessee (E.D. Tenn. 2023). · cites it 4× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 8-8-302 . Section 8-8-303 waives sovereign immunity for counties for violations of § 8-8-302.”
Tawanna Currie v. Haywood Cnty., Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 6× “Whether Haywood county can be held liable for the actions of Deputy Rogers under Tenn. Code Ann. § 8-8-302 ; 4. Whether the trial court’s award of $50,000 in damages against Haywood County violates Tenn.”
Cheryl Merolla v. Wilson Cnty., Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “Tennessee Code Annotated section 8-8-303 provides a waiver of sovereign immunity for claims raised pursuant to section 8-8-302.”
Keller v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty. (M.D. Tenn. 2022). · cites it 2× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 8-8-303 . Under the Sheriff’s Statute, a county may, for example, be liable for a deputy’s intentional assault committed when the officer is “acting by virtue of or under color of his office.”
William Ral Cross, Jr. v. Shelby Cnty., Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 8-8-302 (2002). Section 302 waives the immunity of a county as to suits arising from the acts of a deputy sheriff “acting by virtue of or under color of the office.”
Clark v. Clawson (M.D. Tenn. 2021). “And his § 8-8-303 claim cannot stand alone as an independent cause of action because that section merely “provides a waiver of sovereign immunity for claims raised pursuant to section 8-8-302.”
John Doe v. Randall Pedigo (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). “T.C.A. 8-8-303 (a) The governmental immunity of the county in which the sheriff serves is waived for purposes of § 8-8-302, but to an extent not in excess of the amount of the surety bond executed for that county's sheriff pursuant to § 8-8-103.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 8-8-303(a) — 1 case
Willis v. Barksdale, 625 F. Supp. 411 (W.D. Tenn. 1985). “Section 8-8-303(a) provides: The governmental immunity of the county in which the said sheriff serves is waived for purposes of Section 8-8-302, but to an extent not in excess of the surety bond executed for that county’s sheriff pursuant to Section 8-8-103.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 8-8-303(b) — 1 case
Hensley v. Fowler, 920 S.W.2d 649 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995). “Harbin was not a special deputy at all since T.C.A. § 8-8-303 set out above prohibits service in that capacity without the appropriate bond.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.