Applying harmless error rule and affirming judgment
Also stated as: Affirming judgment based on harmless error
17 Texas opinions cite these pages1993–20196 pages cited by Texas courts
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Applying harmless error rule and affirming judgment
- Cited for: Arguing against remand for harmless error determination
- Cited for: Examining directed verdict error and harmless error
- Cited for: Applying harmless error test to directed verdict
- Cited for: Affirming judgment when error is harmless beyond reasonable doubt
- Cited for: Defendant's appearance in prison garb and harmless error review
Ranked by how often Texas courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
Texas opinions citing these pages
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Nearest issues
- 19 opinions
- 50 opinions
- 199 opinions
- 15 opinions
- 6 opinions
- 10 opinions
- 17 opinions
- 41 opinions
Filed under: Harmless error; Constitutional; Trial
Where else it is alive
Federal 216PA 84SC 29VA 22IL 20NV 17MA 15CO 14GA 11AL 8CA 8IA 8DC 7NY 7KY 6TN 6AZ 4VI 4KS 3ID 2MD 2WI 2CT 1HI 1MN 1MS 1NJ 1OH 1OR 1SD 1UT 1VT 1WY 1
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law