Class; Adequacy; Representative
38 issues with Texas opinions1979–2026
- Determining individual and class standing requirements122 opinions · 2013–2026
- Applying the totality of representation test65 opinions · 2004–2016
- Determining class membership without merits determination51 opinions · 1980–2023
- Determining typicality of class representative claims48 opinions · 1995–2024
- Determining adequacy of class representative46 opinions · 1987–2018
- Determining general appearance status through motions for continuance37 opinions · 1999–2026
- Analyzing class certification and commonality of claims25 opinions · 1997–2008
- Determining proper class representative and adequacy of representation23 opinions · 1982–2015
- Determining class representative typicality requirements22 opinions · 2001–2014
- Determining class representative standing and ability to represent class22 opinions · 1996–2026
- Determining adequacy of class representative and counsel20 opinions · 1992–2008
- Determining standing for putative class representatives19 opinions · 2002–2025
- Determining predominance of common versus individual issues17 opinions · 1998–2015
- Class member interests and scope of class claims11 opinions · 1997–2007
- Determining class member knowledge for limitations defense10 opinions · 2000–2021
- Certifying fail-safe classes and res judicata limitations10 opinions · 2002–2015
- Defining the concept of a pretended class10 opinions · 1979–2015
- Examining the typicality factor for class certification9 opinions · 2000–2017
- Determining adequacy of class representative interests9 opinions · 1989–2013
- Analyzing class definition changes and jurisdictional requirements9 opinions · 1994–2026
- Limiting rule application based on empirical evidence of error7 opinions · 1995–2008
- Determining typicality when named party has unique defense7 opinions · 2006–2023
- Determining class numerosity under civil procedure6 opinions · 1998–2015
- Determining typicality and adequacy of class representation6 opinions · 1989–2015
- Determining typicality of class representative defenses6 opinions · 1987–2015
- Determining class commonality and typicality requirements6 opinions · 1997–2002
- Determining class representative adequacy and class conflicts6 opinions · 2006–2015
- Ensuring class member autonomy against coercive communications5 opinions · 1992–2000
Counts are Texas courts’ opinions citing pages in each issue.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law