Evaluating reversible error from improper questioning (Texas) · Go Syfert
Texas issues › Jury Selection and Trial Misconduct › Reversible error; Motivation; Theory

Evaluating reversible error from improper questioning

27 Texas opinions cite these pages1977–20243 pages cited by Texas courts

The pages courts cite for it

Ranked by how often Texas courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.

Texas opinions citing these pages

From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.

Nearest issues

Filed under: Reversible error; Motivation; Theory

All issues in this group →

Where else it is alive

Federal 56IL 14GA 5PA 5CO 3DC 1

Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.

How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law