Final Judgment Rule
57 issues with Texas opinions1923–2026
- Determining finality of judgment without presumption827 opinions · 1923–2026
- Determining finality of judgment for appeal557 opinions · 1976–2026
- Judgment failing to dispose of all claims is interlocutory378 opinions · 1975–2026
- Determining finality and definiteness of a judgment362 opinions · 1974–2026
- Determining finality of orders for purposes of appeal314 opinions · 2001–2026
- Determining when a judgment is rendered by the court283 opinions · 1956–2026
- Presumption of finality in judgments after trial262 opinions · 1968–2026
- Determining finality of a court order250 opinions · 1985–2026
- Determining finality and appellate jurisdiction of judgments193 opinions · 1992–2026
- Determining final judgment and scope of appeal180 opinions · 1983–2026
- Presumption of finality for judgments and cross-actions180 opinions · 1967–2026
- Determining finality of judgments and appellate jurisdiction170 opinions · 1987–2025
- Finality of judgment despite appeal for preclusion164 opinions · 1977–2026
- Determining finality of default judgments and jurisdiction161 opinions · 1987–2024
- Distinguishing appeal rights for interlocutory versus final judgments155 opinions · 1986–2026
- Interlocutory judgments merging into final judgment154 opinions · 1978–2026
- Determining when a final judgment is entered132 opinions · 1966–2026
- Treat finality of judgment when defendant is unserved132 opinions · 1974–2026
- Determining finality of judge's handwritten orders131 opinions · 1992–2026
- Determining when an order is entered by the court126 opinions · 1991–2026
- Determining when a trial court renders final judgment118 opinions · 1979–2026
- Determining finality of orders based on language112 opinions · 1994–2026
- Determining appealability of post-judgment orders90 opinions · 1995–2026
- Determining when a letter constitutes a final order72 opinions · 1983–2025
- Appealability of orders under specific procedural rules68 opinions · 1994–2026
- Determining the effective date of judgment over docket entries67 opinions · 1977–2025
- Determining finality and scope of partition judgments64 opinions · 1972–2025
- Determining when cumulation decisions are unassailable on appeal63 opinions · 1992–2026
- Determining finality of judgments and interlocutory orders61 opinions · 1985–2026
- Judgments and orders must be entered of record61 opinions · 1978–2026
- Determining appealability of post-trial rulings53 opinions · 1992–2026
- Determining finality of judgment when claims are unresolved52 opinions · 1971–2025
- Determining when a final order is rendered in termination proceedings52 opinions · 1979–2025
- Strict construction of narrow exception to final judgment appeal rule45 opinions · 2000–2022
- Defining "final judgment" in different legal contexts39 opinions · 2001–2024
- Determining court jurisdiction and finality of orders30 opinions · 1989–2025
- Abating case due to lack of final appealable judgment27 opinions · 1995–2025
- Determining finality of judgment and statutory interpretation27 opinions · 1972–2013
- Determining finality and enforceability of court decrees25 opinions · 1939–2023
- Determining finality of orders lacking decretal language25 opinions · 1988–2026
- Determining finality of postjudgment orders22 opinions · 1996–2025
- Limiting review to decisions of courts of appeals15 opinions · 1981–2026
- Determining finality and jurisdiction of appealable orders13 opinions · 2010–2026
- Limiting scope of partial judgment release and relief12 opinions · 2005–2026
- Determining finality of judgments and standard of review7 opinions · 1990–2025
- Reviewing post-judgment claims and jurisdictional issues7 opinions · 1994–2011
- Promoting judicial efficiency through finality of judgment6 opinions · 1998–2015
- Defining final order and associate judge's role6 opinions · 2010–2013
Counts are Texas courts’ opinions citing pages in each issue.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law