Defining status quo and temporary injunction requirements
Also stated as: Granting temporary injunction without specific performance request
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Defining status quo and temporary injunction requirements
- Cited for: Temporary injunctions requiring setting cause for trial
- Cited for: Granting temporary injunction without specific performance request
- Cited for: Requirements for issuing a temporary injunction
- Cited for: Setting forth reasons for granting temporary injunction
- Cited for: Requirements for granting a temporary injunction
- Cited for: Requirements for specificity in temporary injunction orders
- Cited for: Requiring specific reasons for temporary injunctive relief
Ranked by how often Texas courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
Texas opinions citing these pages
- Nicholas Kreines v. ES3 Minerals, LLC, No. 15-25-00027-CV (Tex. App.—15th Dist. Dec. 4, 2025)
- Lynh Thy Pham Smiley Dental, PLLC v. M&M Orthodontics, PA & U Too Dental, PLLC, No. 04-23-00780-CV (Tex. App.—San Antonio June 26, 2024)
- Damari Duarte v. Amit Thandi, No. 01-23-00482-CV (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] May 9, 2024)
- Michael Williams v. Wildwood Dev. Co., No. 10-22-00250-CV (Tex. App.—Waco Mar. 15, 2023)
- in the Est. of Soledad Banegas Shultz, No. 11-21-00177-CV, 2022 WL 4099404 (Tex. App.—Eastland Sept. 8, 2022)
- City of Brownsville v. Brownsville GMS, No. 13-19-00311-CV (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg May 6, 2021)
- Summers Drywall Servs., Inc. v. Action Gypsum Supply, LP, No. 14-18-00736-CV (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Aug. 22, 2019)
- Good Shepherd Hosp., Inc. v. Select Specialty Hosp. - Longview, Inc., 563 S.W.3d 923 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2018)
- Hartwell v. Lone Star, PCA, 528 S.W.3d 750 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2017)
- Oak Mortg. Grp., Inc. v. Ameripro Funding, Inc., No. 03-15-00416-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Sept. 25, 2015)
- Michael J. DeLitta v. Nancy Schaefer, No. 03-15-00280-CV (Tex. App.—Austin July 20, 2015)
- David P. Desenberg, Flatmax Energy, L. P., Flatmax Oil & Gas, L.L.C., Keith H. Baker, Reagan Rich, & Big Reef Energy, L.L.C. v. Everest Resource Co. C-5 Oil & Gas, No. 13-15-00011-CV (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi Feb. 6, 2015)
- In re David A. Chaumette, 456 S.W.3d 299 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2014)
- Law Funder, LLC v. Law Offices of Douglas A. Allison, No. 13-12-00375-CV (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi Mar. 6, 2014)
- Couns. Fin. Servs., L.L.C. v. David McQuade Leibowitz & David McQuade Leibowitz, P.C., No. 13-10-00200-CV, 2011 WL 2652158 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi July 1, 2011)
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Named doctrine
The doctrine as Texas courts name it, with the cases on each side (State Issue Map).
Nearest issues
- 726 opinions
- 299 opinions
- 183 opinions
- 237 opinions
- 495 opinions
- 233 opinions
- 316 opinions
- 276 opinions
Filed under: Injunction; Temporary; Injunctive relief
Where else it is alive
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law