Harm; Egregious; Error
18 issues with Texas opinions1981–2026
- Determining error and harm in jury charge issues1,755 opinions · 1986–2026
- Evaluating egregious harm from charge error1,122 opinions · 1991–2026
- Determining egregious harm for jury instruction error987 opinions · 1986–2026
- Determining egregious harm from jury charge error964 opinions · 1986–2026
- Determining harmfulness of charge error and proximate cause508 opinions · 1992–2026
- Determining egregious harm under almanza standard426 opinions · 1988–2026
- Distinguishing fundamental error from ordinary error in charges424 opinions · 1981–2026
- Evaluating error effect without burden of proving harm397 opinions · 1993–2026
- Determining harm in error analysis for trial court rulings325 opinions · 1992–2026
- Determining harm for preserved charging error318 opinions · 1988–2026
- Analyzing statutory error under harm analysis310 opinions · 1993–2026
- Determining harm standard for trial error review267 opinions · 1993–2026
- Reviewing egregious harm standard for instruction omission250 opinions · 2001–2026
- Curing error from prior incarceration references by instruction176 opinions · 1982–2026
- Determining harmlessness of improper bolstering evidence172 opinions · 1990–2025
- Analyzing harm from failure to include sudden passion instruction156 opinions · 1995–2026
- Assessing harm from improper mens rea definitions in jury charge138 opinions · 1983–2026
- Determining egregious harm for reversal of conviction77 opinions · 1988–2025
Counts are Texas courts’ opinions citing pages in each issue.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law