Determining harmless error when record is evenly balanced
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Determining harmless error when record is evenly balanced
- Cited for: Harmless error analysis of misjoinder of counts
Ranked by how often Texas courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
Texas opinions citing these pages
- Joe Luis Becerra v. State of Texas, No. 10-17-00143-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 12, 2024)
- Joe Luis Becerra v. State of Texas, No. 10-17-00143-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 8, 2024)
- In re Robert Lee Brown, No. 03-14-00681-CR (Tex. App.—Austin Feb. 13, 2015)
- McDonald, Robert Charles, No. PD-1943-04 (Tex. Crim. App. Nov. 23, 2005)
- in the Matter of E.M.R., a Juv., 55 S.W.3d 712 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2001)
- Valdez, Jose Angel Dominguez v. State, No. 13-00-00002-CR (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi July 19, 2001)
- Tanguma, Charles v. State, No. 13-99-00490-CR (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi Apr. 12, 2001)
- Marie Lisette Garcia Vega v. State, No. 13-98-00044-CR (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi Nov. 9, 2000)
- in the Matter of C. R., No. 03-97-00785-CV (Tex. App.—Austin May 27, 1999)
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Nearest issues
- 180 opinions
- 11 opinions
- 16 opinions
- 81 opinions
- 22 opinions
- 27 opinions
- 61 opinions
- 27 opinions
Filed under: Harmless and Plain Error Analysis
Where else it is alive
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law