Determining if a settlement constitutes a sub rosa plan
Also stated as: Reviewing plan feasibility regarding potential civil judgments
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Determining if a settlement constitutes a sub rosa plan
- Cited for: Court-ordered plan standards versus legislative plan considerations
- Cited for: Determining principles for temporary court-ordered plans
- Cited for: Preventing liability for precondemnation planning activities
- Cited for: Analyzing plan deviations under equal protection clause
Ranked by how often Texas courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
Texas opinions citing these pages
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Filed under: Plan; Administrator; Interpretation
Where else it is alive
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law